Laserfiche WebLink
Consultants' Final Report - Page 9 <br />anti -discrimination statutes was first tried by Minneapolis' but has failed to catch <br />on in general.10 However, many municipalities have been very successful in <br />regulating where pornographic businesses and adult entertainment businesses can <br />locate through the use of zoning laws., <br />Municipalities have followed two major strategies in regulating the location <br />of adult entertainment businesses. One approach is to concentrate adult <br />businesses in a limited area, often called the Boston or "combat zone" approach. <br />The other approach follows the opposite tactic by dispersing adult entertainment <br />businesses, preventing their concentration, often called the Detroit approach.`1 <br />In Boston, adult entertainment businesses had been unofficially <br />concentrated in a specific area of the city for many years.''- This "combat zone" <br />was officially established as the Adult Entertainment District in 1974. It was felt <br />that by formally restricting such businesses to an area where they were already <br />established would prevent the spreading of these businesses to neighborhoods <br />9 Minneapolis Code of Ordinances (MDO), Title 7, ch. 139.20, sec. 3, subd. (gg), <br />(I)- <br />" See Downs supra note 2 <br />" For a general discussion of these two approaches see Planning Committee of <br />the Los Angeles City Council, Study of the Effects of the Concentration of Adult <br />Entertainment Establishments In the City of Los Angeles, Los Angeles City Planning <br />Department (June, 1977) (Hereinafter LA Studv). <br />'' This discussion of Boston and the "combat zone" approach is taken from the LA <br />Study id., at 9-10. <br />EVER00 349 <br />