My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
4526 FEDERAL AVE 2018-01-02 MF Import
>
Address Records
>
FEDERAL AVE
>
4526
>
4526 FEDERAL AVE 2018-01-02 MF Import
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/7/2022 1:45:42 PM
Creation date
2/10/2017 4:41:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Address Document
Street Name
FEDERAL AVE
Street Number
4526
Imported From Microfiche
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
542
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Findings and Recommendations of the <br />Nearing Examiner of the Cityy of Everett <br />Luther 3 Child Center SPU #4-79 <br />Page <br />other amenities to the structure. <br />S. It is the position of the City of Everett•Planning Department that the <br />Applicant has deviated from the conditions listed in the Special Use Per- <br />mit for the subject property and that this deviation has resulted in un- <br />approved changes from the original site plan and the original approved <br />project. <br />6. In particular, the Planning Department testified that the Applicant deviat- <br />ed frorm Condition #6 of- the original Special Property Use Permit. Con- <br />dition 46 of the Special Property Use Permit is as.follows: <br />All site improvements, including, landscaping, shall conform <br />with the site plan submitted on October 10, 1979, or be sub- <br />ject to additional Planning Commission and City Council review. <br />The Planning Department of the City of Everett, Washington, contends that <br />the deviation from Condition #6 of the original Special Property Use Permit <br />included the following: <br />A. The original approval required that 68 off-street parking spaces be <br />provided. (The F.pplicant is currently proposing 44 spaces.) <br />B. The original plans called for the structure to be located approximately <br />45 feet north of its actual location. <br />C. The original building design was modified to allow the addition of <br />approximately 10 feet to the west end of the building. <br />D. The roof line of the structure was modified after plans were submitted <br />to the Planning Commission and City Council. The initial plans called <br />for a 6 foot depression in'the roofline over the main entrance. This <br />feature would have reduced the visual impact of the proposed 150 foot <br />long structure on surrounding residential properties. <br />7. It is the Planning Department's position that the reduction in the parking <br />spaces, the relocation of the structure, the elongation of the structure, <br />and the changes in the roofline reduced the compatibility of the project <br />with the surrounding neighborhood. <br />8.. In order to correct the deviations from the original Special Property Use <br />Permit, the Planning Department of the City of Everett, Washington, has <br />recommended the approval of the Special Property Use Permit reconsidera- <br />tion with the following conditions being imposed to create greater neigh- <br />borhood compatibility: <br />1. That the landscaping plans be provided to and approved by the Planning <br />and Parks Departments showing substantial landscaping on the south <br />and east sides of the structure to reduce the visual impact of the <br />structure on the surrounding residential properties. There shall be <br />at.a.minimum 15'evergreen trees 10 feet.in height planted around the <br />ina�n south entrance to the facility'. An additional 25 trees 10 feet <br />in height shall be planted along the edges with exposure to the resi- <br />dential areas. <br />2. That the number of parking spaces and the design of the parking lot <br />is acceptable to the Transporation Engineer. <br />3. Additional. improvements: Raised lip around the catch basins and the <br />eastern edge of road. <br />9. The Applicant testified that because of financial restraints it was forced <br />to abandon some of the original designs as submitted to the City of Everett, <br />and, was forced to relocate some of the structures that were constructed. <br />It is the position of the Applicant, however, that the City had constructive <br />notice of these changes in that the Applicant did submit the plans to the <br />City prior to construction. <br />-3- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.