Laserfiche WebLink
i; <br /> �,i ,pyy �11 <br /> �I <br /> �IC, Public Welfare: <br /> ��� Finding: The structure is a 2300 sq. ft. two-story and will continue <br /> I� to be used a� storage if the Variance is not granted. <br /> n <br /> ilConclusion: In light of What is there noW, the residential character <br /> � of the neighborhood xill not change, based on the fact it changed when <br /> I <br /> permits were issued to build the original structure. ! <br /> I' � <br /> ID. Comprehensive Plan: <br /> I� Finding: The 1968 Plan shows this area as Single Family Residential; <br /> I 1978 plan shows this area as Medium Density Res. I <br /> Conclusion: Duplex units are allowed in some Single Family zones. <br /> I Duplex units should be similar to single family detached units (height, i <br /> bulk, parking). This proposed unit is much larger in scale than a � <br /> i� typical single family or duplex unit. i <br /> RECOi4MENDATION: APPROVE <br /> ; Approve the Variance as re.�uested by the applicant aitl� the following 'i <br /> lii . onditions. <br /> jl1. Connect the structure with a carport to the existing single fam3ly <br /> i residence. <br /> I <br /> �I STAFF ANALYSIS: <br /> i ?'he City recommended approval of this Variance based on the fact that we �, <br /> I iss::?d a permit for a garage and storage area that we knew would not be used ' <br /> II as such. The building itself, while being constructed, aas built as a garage <br /> �� with a residential unit above. It's reasonable to assume that the applicant <br /> i; thought this was in keeping uith the Code, but later learned it was not. <br /> �I <br /> I� <br /> I�i <br /> I�I � <br /> �I <br /> I� <br /> i'I�I I I <br /> � �I <br /> �i� I <br /> i I <br /> i� I <br /> I I <br /> I f <br /> � <br /> i� <br /> i <br /> i <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> � <br /> II <br />