Laserfiche WebLink
3. Site Plan <br /> 4. Detaiied Site Plan <br /> 5. Survey <br /> 6. Applicani's Narrative Statement and Email <br /> 7. Geotechnicai Assessment <br /> 8. City's GO! Sync Map <br /> 9. Photos <br /> 10. Cerlificate of Occupancy dated June 8, 1980 (City of Everett Microfilm Record) <br /> 11. Original Site Plan and Construction Permit (City of Everett Microfilm Record) <br /> 12. Snohomish County Assessor's Structure Information and F'hoto of Residence <br /> 13. Affidavit of Publication <br /> 14. EMC Development Siandards '�able 6.1 and Section 19.39.150.C(11) <br /> All of lhe exhibits are available for inspection at the Hearing Examiner's Office located at <br /> 2930 Wetmore Avenue, Sih floor, Everett, Washinglon. <br /> Based ;,Non a review of the above record, the following Findings of Fact and <br /> Conc!usions hereby constitute the basis of the decision of lhe Everett Hearing <br /> Examiner. <br /> FINDINGS OF FACT <br /> 1 . The Applicanis requested variances for the property at 4302 Crescent Avenue, <br /> Everett, Washington. The reques�ed variances inciude: a reduced front setback; <br /> a reduced side setback from lhe interior property line; and allowance of an <br /> uncovered deck to encroach into a front setback in excess of the permitted <br /> setback depth. The subject property is zoned R-1, Single-Family Detached Low <br /> Density. (exhibit 1, sta(f report; testimony of Ms. Firnstahl) <br /> 2. Table 6.1 of the Developmenl Standards chapter of the City of �verett, as set <br /> torth in Everett Municipal Code (EMC) 19.6, requires a 20-foot setback from the <br /> front property line in an R-1 zone. The Applicants seek a variance to allow the <br /> front setback off Crescent Avenue lo be less lhan the required standard. The <br /> Applicanls a�so seek a variance from the five-foot side setback on the north <br /> intenor property line. (exhibit 1, sta/f report; testimony of Ms. Firnstahl) <br /> 3. In lhe City of Everett, uncovered decks ihat are nol in excess of 42-inches above <br /> grade may not encroach inlo the (ronl setback area by more lhan fifty-percent of <br /> the required setback depth. (EMC 19.39.150.C(11) (exhibit 1, sfa(freport; <br /> testimony of Ms. Firnstalil) <br /> 4. The subject properly is developed with a single-family residence that was <br /> constructed in the early 1980's. At the time of construction, the residence was <br /> consistent with the zoning code standards in e(fect. It was built with required <br /> permits. (testimonyolMs. �irnstahl) <br /> z� 7 <br />