Laserfiche WebLink
19. ECONOMIC Il�4'ACT (John Beadle, Dennis McLaughlin, Nancy Patvalds) The <br /> commentors were concerned that if the Bingo hall is displaced, the ciry will lose a � <br /> substantial tax contribution as the hallis not relocatable within the current <br /> jurisdicrion. An addidorra! impact would be loss of employment. <br /> Because this business was located in the general area prior ro moving to it� present <br /> location, the project proponenu believe that the biago hall can be relocated within <br /> the Everett city l�mits. Relocation of the hall outside the city limit would not cause <br /> a significant economic impact to either the city's taz base or local employment. <br /> Relocadon of the bingo hall is not likely to cause permanent closure of the ' <br /> business, Employees of the facility, and the other affected businesses, could <br /> relocate with the business at their option. Permanent closure of any of the affected <br /> businesses would not be a significant impact to local employment. <br /> 20. JOINT USE / LEASE OF BINGO HALL (Dennis McLaughlin) The commentor <br /> requested clarification of;ioint use"/ "(eare" ar used in the EA. <br /> "7oint use", as used in the EA, refers to the ccexistence of the Park and Ride and <br /> bingo hall on the same property. The "lease" was referring to the document which <br /> would allow the "joint use." <br /> 21. STAGID CONSTRUCITON (Dennis McLaughlin) The commentor requested a <br /> ameline for construction of Stage 2. <br /> The andcipated year of opening for Sta;e 2 is 1997. <br /> 22. TRAFFIC (Dennis McLaughlin, Robert Betker) ?he commeraors requesred <br /> clari�cation of Hazardous Accident Locations and more detailed information on <br /> tra�(jFc impacts. <br /> A Hazardous (High) Accident Location (HAL) is generally determined by accident <br /> rates and severiry. Depending on accident severity, two to six accidents at one <br /> location over a two year period may warrant designadon as a HAL. <br /> The aaffic informadon provided in the EA was a brief summary of a detailed <br /> Traffic Analysis prepared for the proposal. The analysis indicate� the 1989 <br /> average wetkday daily traffic (AWDTj volume on F1 Capitan Way was about <br /> 5,040 east of the existing west entcance to Site 1. Predicted volumes for 1993 and <br /> 2010 were not expected to vary for either the Build or NaBuild conditions. <br /> Volumes between the access and SR 527 would be influenced by completion of <br /> Site 1 as noted in the EA. In 1993 the site would•increase volumes by 900 units <br /> per weekday. In 2010, the increase is expected to be 1,500. The 1993 increase <br /> was not substantial enough to yield an unacceptable Level of Service (LOS); <br /> however, by 2010 the LOS would be reduced such that signal and channelization <br /> improvements at the northbound I-5 off-ramp intersection with SR 527/ El Capitan <br /> Way would be needed. These mitigation measur,x were included in the original <br /> proposal as stated in the Er; and are adequate to maintain an acceptable LOS. <br /> 6 <br /> � <br /> � <br /> � <br />