1724 ENGLAND AVE 2016-01-01 MF Import

��, � V a. The rlght-of-Nny on Dover Street is BO feet ride, and yet the street Irtv�rovements constructad rTthin tAe right-of-ray are less then 24 feet ride. Dover Street is a dead-end cui�•de-sac rhich rlll not be extended any ferther Deyond the development of Edgemoor Hetghts, end future Improvements rill not De necessary on thfs street. The right-of-ray is therefore approxfineteiy 30 feet rlder t�an would normally be requfred for thls type of publtc sireet� and this additlonal rtght-of-way adversely impacts the development potential of thfs lot. Since there Is a seperatton rhfch currently exists between the paved walkray a+lorg Dover Street and the property Iine of approxlrtetely 15 teet, if the seTback wes reduced to be equal to zero feet (0� ) a(org Dover Street. the bullding rould still be set 15 feet back from the back of the walkway. Therefore, It would not be causfng a sfght distance problem, and it rould not be located fmmediately adjaceni• to the traveled surface of the roadway. b. The lot is at an elevat(on of approximately eight feet (8�) higher than Dover Street at the right-of-way IineN and t�e requested variance vould result (n the constru c• tion of a building on the right-of-ray lioe rhich Moutdp once again, bo less vfsibie to motorfsts alorc� Dover Street and wculd certainly not Impact the public health, safety and welfare. c. England Avenue Is a very short dead-end street as well , whtch has a Ifmited number of residentfal units galnfng access to it. The rlght-of-wey for England Avenue Is also wider than wouid be required to accanmodete any Improvements on the street and. therefore, a setback variance to locate a structure closer to the rtght-of- ray would not adversely impact the traffic safety along the street. d. Sight distance at the inters ectlon rill not be impacteci since the "through street^ Is considered Dover Streei and there will be few, tf any, cars turn(ng right onto England Avenue from Dover Street northbound. Even In this event. the potentlal house would stlll be con- strurted far enough away from the Intersectfon considering the large right-of-way available on each street to eliminate any posslble safety hazard. a. There are no adJacent property orners rho rill be adversely Impacted by this varlance since the request Is to ectually move the bullding away from the tro side property Iines and bring it closer to the right-of-way 1261 .55 ' -2- �-=�m��