Laserfiche WebLink
a. Findings: See Criteria #3. <br />b. Conclusions: See Criteria #3 <br />Criterion No. 5: <br />The granting of the variance is consistent with the goals and policies of <br />the Everett General Plan. <br />Findings: The Everett General Plan designates this property <br />as 4.4 Mixed Use Commercial. <br />b. Conclusions: The proposed signage for the commercial use <br />of the subject property is consistent with the Everett General <br />Plan. <br />Criterion No. 6: <br />The need for the requested variance is not the result of a self-created <br />hardship. <br />a. Findings: The applicant has stated that the conditions which <br />necessitate this variance request are all pre-existing and not <br />the result of a self-created hardship. The existing drivelane, <br />and access points to the site are located such that it is difficult <br />to locate a new sign on site which complies with all code <br />requirements. The pole sign that currently exists on site does <br />not meet the street setback for height, and therefore is <br />considered nonconforming. The applicant would have <br />difficulties refacing the existing sign due to a provision in the <br />zoning code which requires that all nonconforming signs be <br />brought into conformance when a new sign is proposed on <br />site, and also prohibits the structural alteration of a <br />nonconforming sign. The applicant is proposing to remove <br />this nonconforming sign. <br />b. Conclusions: There are unique circumstances regarding the <br />location of existing improvements on the property including, <br />drivelanes, landscaping, and on site circulation patterns that <br />all lend to the need for the requested variance, and therefore <br />the requested variance is not the result of a self-created <br />hardship. <br />