1824 LOMBARD AVE 2016-01-01 MF Import

� proposed structure does provide for the required two parking stalls on site, and could still meet this requirement if the structure were in compliance with all zoning code requirements. b. Conclusions: The City provided written notice to ali property owners within 300 feet of the subject site. No comments were received. The proposed variance has been reviewed by the City Public Works and Building Departments. The following comments were received: 1) Building permits from the City are required for construction; 2) Connect doa�nspouts to sidesewer. �Criterion No. 3: That the variance will only grant the subject property the same general rights enjoyed by other property in the same area and zone as the subject property. a. Findinc,�s: Th� applicant has stated that many properties abuttinr� the alley along the 1800 block between Lombard and Oakes Street have garages which appear to 5e located on or close to the rear property line. Additionally, many of the accessory structures and residences in the area are located either right on or very close to the side property line. While many of the structures in the area may not comply with current building setbacks, many of these structures could be certified as legal non-conforming, indicating they were constructed prior to the code standards in effect today. Upon review of the City's Permit Database, no variance applications were found for pruperties within the immediate vicinity of the subject property. b. Conclusions: Although several structures in the area may fail to comply with the required five foot side setback, and may exceed rear yard coverage, it is likely that these structures were built prior to the effec[ive date of the Zoning Code which established these requirements. Criterion No. 4: That the variance is the minimum necessary to allow the subject property the general rights described in Criterion 3. a. Findings: See � •reria #3. b. Conclusior; � . ,riteria #3 Criterion No. 5: The granting of the variance is consistent with the goals and policies of the E.verett General Pian. a. �ind-;ngs: The Everett General Plan designates this property as 1.3, Si�zgle Family Detached, 10-12 Dwellings per gross acre. b. Conclusions: The proposed use of the subject property for ^ , re:.:dential purposes is consistent with the Everett General Plan. � 4