2521 LOMBARD AVE 2016-01-01 MF Import

not increase traffic on-site. No traffic mitigation plan was required. The City reserved the right to require a traffic siudy if the Applicant adds a day care facility or school function io the church. (exhibit , page 2J 8. Currenily on-site are 50 parking stalls. While the expansion would eliminate some of the sialls, lhe Applicant proposed to add six new parking stalls directly off the ailey. Pursuant to EMC 19.34.020 Table No. 34-1, a minimum of one parking stall must be provided for every five seats in the church. According io the Applicant, there are approximately 442 linear feet of pews within the chapel area of the church. Ai least 44 parking stalls are required. The Applicant praposes 56 stalls after :he expansion. Adequate off-street parking is available. (exhibif 1) 9. The subjeci property is located in an R-4, Multiple-Family I-ligh Density zone. As noted, the property has long been developed wiih the ApplicanYs church facility. The expansion wouid incorporate the existiny archilectural elements of the existing structure. It would not exceed ihe allowable height of 80 feet and would satisfy all setbacks. It is being designed to be compatible in size and scale with the existing church structure. Landscaping along ihe northern �roperty line between the church parking facility and the residences to ihe north would be enhanced. (exhibit 1, page 3) 10. No signage is proposed for the facility. (exhibit 1, page 3) 11. According to the Ciiy, the site has what appears to be adequate landscaping along ihe southern and western property lines, but additional landscaping �vould be required on the northern property line adjacent to the resideniial structure. The north property landscaping would mitigate potential parking lot nuisances to ihe properties adjacent to it. The landscaping plan must be reviewed and approved by the Planning Department prior to final permit approval. (exhibit 1, page 4) 12. Construction would generate some nuisance irritants such as noise, smoke, dust, odor, glare, visual blight and other undesirable impacts. These, however, are temporary and would not be preseni when the project is completed. There is no long term nuisance irritants expected from the proposed development. (exhibit 1, page 4) 13. The expansion is consistent with the Goais and Policies of ihe Everett General Comprehensive Plan. (exhibif 1, page 4) 14. Pursuant to ihe Siate Environmental Pc�licy Act (SEPA1, the City of Everett was designated as the lead agency for review of environmental impacts from the proposed development. On October 1, 2004, the City issued a Final Mitigated Determination of Non-Significant (MDNS). Conditions were imposed which the 1 4 '`�� � �; ,