Laserfiche WebLink
SEP 17 '98 13��2 FR PaJ FIELD OPSiRE 206 603 2886 TQ FRALEYiSTR1CKEA, P.0.!�13 <br />portion of the property. The owner of the property has entered into an <br />easement agreement with the Applicar�t. (Ezhibit 1, Hunt testimony) <br />3. The subject property is zoned R-3, Multlple-Family Density. The <br />properties to the north and west have an R-3, Single and M�Itiple-Family <br />Residential zoning designation, while the prpperty to fhe south is zoned <br />R-2 with Single-Family ResidenGal designation. 'fhe aroperty to the east <br />is Interstate 5. (Exhiuit 1, Siddiq testimony) <br />4. In the City of Everett, cellular telepho�ie towers are classified as an <br />above ground utility subject to evaluation criteria of Ef�AC <br />19.41.150.D.1.a (Special Property Use Pertnits). The ApplicanYs <br />application for a Special Property Use Permit was deemed ccmp�ete on <br />Aprii 8, 1A98. (Exhibit 1, Siddiq testimony) <br />Purs��ant to the State Environmental Policy Act (SEF'A), the City of <br />Everett was c:esiynated as the lead agency for the identifi�tion of any <br />environmentai ircipacts resulting from the proposed projeci. On June 19. <br />1998, the City issued a final Mitigated Determir,stion of Non-Significance <br />(MDNS). One comment letter was issued dc:ring the public comment <br />pariod, but no appeal was filed. The eppea( period ended July 2, 1998. <br />(Exhibit 5) <br />6. In the City of Everett, Special Property Use Permit requests are reviewed <br />pursuant to the criteria as set forth in EMC 19.41.150.C. Ttiose criteria <br />include: <br />(a) The need of the neighborhood, district, or City for a proposed <br />Special Property Use. <br />(b) The adequacy of streets, utilities, and public services required to <br />szrve a propased use. <br />(c) The impact of traffic generated by the proposed use on the <br />surrounding area, pedestrian circulation and public safety; and ability of <br />the praponent to mitigate such potential impacts. <br />(d) The provision of adequate off-street parking, on-site circulation, <br />and site access. <br />(e) Compatibility of proposed structures and improvements with <br />surrounding properties. including the �ize, height, location, setback and <br />arrangement of all proposed buildings and facilities, especial!y as they <br />