8521 HOLLY DR 2016-01-01 MF Import

c .� .�Q .Y"'w- � . .. ' -. . ' ,.T ...' ;. ' . , ' _ ��w. � �- - _ . .__ _ _____ ___. _._ -�a+e",.w.�.d1� ._ Y .._ , . . .,_..','."`"'- ' . . _.. __ __-. ...Y__:� �. i•..` .� O paul Yerger Appeal 2-92 � page -4- 10. The City cancluded that there is a poten[ial for five lots on the parcel of lsnd that la the aubject of the ehorc aubdivision. Theae 1ots, although uot officially draxn or surveyed, were pert of concepcual deaigns euhmitted by the City Plaaaing. Depsrteenc a¢d the Cicy Pu611c Siorka Departme�t. Ae a reei�lt of [hese conceptusl draxinga, the City determined that the propoeed ehort subdiviuioc muac he developed with half-etteet improvemente becauee there is a poteatis.l for more than fou: dxelliag ualta vrith Che glat. . 11. The parcel of. laad that Sucludea the pra�oeed preliminary pla[ conals�s of .93 acrea or 40,509 equare feet. Of the chree locs, Lots Y2 and V3 contala approximately 32,70� equare feet and meaeure approzimately 269 feet ia depth. The City atsted that a.11 proposed lota ezceed the required mialmum for R-1 lota which la 7,000 aquare feet and that ehere � ie a potential for Lota /2 and aJ to be further ohoY,t platted. 12. The Appellant objected to the City's poaition wlth regard to the potentla'. lot yleld and the require�ent for the half-atreet improvemeate. The Appellant arAued chat the Cicy hae not demonatraced that the E,cscel hae a potentla� ior the five lote. 13. Ooe of the Clty's conceptual deeigne would reault Sn the re�oval of the � ezietiag carport aad deta^hed garaRe on propoeed Lot P2 of the ehort eubdivlslon. With the re�oval of theee euvctures ou propoeed Lot 92, adequate room for further eubdiviaion exleta. 14. The City eubmltted that during the pre-application discuaeion vlth the � pppellant, aketchae xere prnvided xhich indicated that there vas a poso1bi11ty of more thaa four lote on-aite. According to the Clty, with the aubmittal of additional detaile of [he ahott plat, the staff vne able to determine that the mazimssn lot yield urithia the parce: could be five lote inatead of three, aad thua the esception to EHC 18.24.100 c+ny not apply. 15. The City eubmitted ;:.hat ia alditian to the argumeaca :or the potential for flvn lote, FSIC 18.04.050 aluo mandatee a need for half-street improveamta. �Thie ordinance requirea [hat all coetiguoue parcela of land thtt are� to De eubdivlded conatitute a aiagle eubdiviaion actrou. Accordias �o th�+ Clty� the property of �the Apprllaat in lot �1 of [he Csacadn tfountula Pien DSvielon, rhlch Ss ad,jacent to the p�oponed plat, could Tx connidered ae pazt of a proposed subdivlaion ia the fut-ure_ Thie additlon.al land wuld increaee the potentinl eubdlvieion of all o: t..' .� the Appellaat'a property to a ma�.mum of alz lota. . 16. The Sppellant eu6mitted that there ie no 1a.ention, vhntaoever, :. - developiag the adjacent lot, and it ahould not be coneldered as parc �.'-. the propoeed eubdivlaion. � ' 17. The City ot Everett Public Aorke Deparcneat aubmitted that 1n addition � to the requlremente aa set forth in EHC 18.24.100, othcr legal authority eziate for the requlrement of half-atreet improvementa of the ehort plat. In perticular, the CSty af Everztt Publlc Siozks Depar�ent cited RCW 58.17.060 aad RCA 58.17.110 ae givinb the City the authorlty to ! � tequire half-etreet Smproves�eata. The Ccp nuhaitt.ed evidence (ezhlblt .��'� � fJ) that aupported eidewalks for the safety,ot achool children. �,4 ' �� :, ,. ....£•,-;.. .,. ?2 �� � � � ,:a. ,.�: y =�` � " , � , f +li.. YY�a �r� �:' 1e�xt.�y�„ .�...n�o-R�� .,e�r, i�Fy*..4�: ":: '� .._.�fi � k� .:� a✓`( 4 R . nf,iam�"a'RJyQt». . ; .^'� :��: � � .T� �.� ` � . . :��¢_�f u . ..: '3. ,. ''s,_ �i�V _. _ _ , i' .��