My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1115 HOYT AVE 2016-01-01 MF Import
>
Address Records
>
HOYT AVE
>
1115
>
1115 HOYT AVE 2016-01-01 MF Import
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/18/2017 2:23:17 PM
Creation date
2/18/2017 2:22:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Address Document
Street Name
HOYT AVE
Street Number
1115
Imported From Microfiche
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
180
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The McKEEs replied !hat it has baei for sale for two years, and that yes, they are <br /> interviewing new agents now. Previous agents weren't doing a very aggressive job, <br /> one was interested in purchasing the property himself. <br /> JOHN HOOPER asked how often the residence has been fully rented, with both units <br /> occupied. <br /> The McKEEs replied that it has not been fully occupied since the remodel started. <br /> Various people started projects and then gave up. Future remodel possi6ilides were <br /> described. The south unit is not being rented while the property is for sale, to make it <br /> easier to show. The north unit has not been rented for over four years. <br /> JOAN HOOPER asked how long the garage has been unusable for parking. <br /> DANA MEEKS commented that according to neighbors it has been 15 years. <br /> Conflicting statements were made by DANA MEEKS and the McKEEs about what the <br /> building has been usable for, for how long. TON McKEE said it was usable until <br /> damaged by vandalism. <br /> JOHN HOPPER asked when it was last used as a parking structure. <br /> The McKEEs replied 4-S years ago. <br /> .70HN JONES asked Tim Tyler if the ability to re-build a structure of the same <br /> dimensions could be protected without keeping [he present building. <br /> DANA MEEKS said that the neighbors would support a solution that allowed <br /> rebuilding in the non-conforming dimensions, to conserve parking spaces. <br /> TIM TYLER said that in the case of non-conforming structures the City is liberal .bout <br /> how much of the structure has to be left for it to be re-built as non-conforming. If <br /> there was a foundation, taking i[ down to the foundation would probably preserve the <br /> right to rebuild on tha[ foundation. Without a fuundation it is more awkwazd, a <br /> variance would be needed, there aze criteria beyond the support of the neighborhood <br /> that would have to be met. <br /> TOM McKEE said that they would certainiy like a solution that protects the option to <br /> keep a four-car garage there. <br /> PAM McICEE stated that they could not undertake additional expense right now, but <br /> tha[possibly the new owners would want to pursue that. <br /> JOHN JONES commented that it seems to him that a� solution will involve <br /> demolition. <br /> TOM McICEE stated that he is asking for a six month moratorium, to give time for <br /> real estate [ransaction, before any action is required, then perhaps they could do <br /> something about a foundation. He recounted some history of other dealings with City, <br /> both at this and o[her properties. <br /> JEFF MOORE asked Tom McKee if he was now asking for a six-month extension, <br /> rather than the: 90 days mentioned in his letter requesting the appeal hearing? <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.