1500 INDUSTRY ST 2018-01-01 MF Import

5. Where utility connections arc rcquired through adjaccnt properties or connecting into residential areas, casements must be located in such a manner as to minimize the visual impact on the adjoining properties to the b�eatest extent feasible and nuist be revegetated in accordance with a landscaping plan appro��ed by thc Planning Department. Landscaping must bc consistcnt with Engincering and Public Services requirements for protcction and maintenancc of the utility eascment and facilities and should consist of native shrubs and groundcover. (SEPA Land and Shoreline Use, Plant and Animal, and Public Services and Utilities Policies) 6. See Condition 4 on page 21. (SEPA Land and Shorcline Use, Plant and Animal, and Public Services and Utilities Policies) 8.7 SE�i'Eit 8.7.1 Threshold Capacity of Ihe system is 1,700 galluns per gross acre per day, and 4,000 gallons per gross acrc per day of instantaneous peak 11ow. Sorae sites may ha��e capacity ir. �:;xcess of the threshold available to servc potential users. [f a proposal would exceed 1,700 gallons per gruss acre per day and/or 4,000 gallons per gross acre per day of instantaneous peak Ilow, additional analysis will be required, The additional analysis may be as simplc as calculltions compieted by the Public Works Department prior ro a pre-application meeting on a specific development proposal. 'The additional analysis must detcrmine how the proposal's sewer demand will affect the sewer system. Projects with no additional major improvements needed and no adverse cumulative impacts on the sewer system are covered by this analysis. Additional SEPA analysis will be required for projects that may require major improvements not identified in the EIS or that may have adverse cumulative impacts on the sewer system. The L[S analysis docs not cover the impacts of construction of a new sewer main across Japanese Gulch. Additional analysis is required to revic�v altemative routes for the linc that will minimize the impacts of the proposal, or altemative means of providing sewers to Ihat area. 8.7.3 Mi[�gation Measures: None Miti�ation Measures: The environmental impacts of this proposal are documented in the Environmental Checklist and other inforniation on file with the City. The li.;ted requiremcnts are placed in response to our review of this information: NIIT[GATION OF ADVERSE IMPACTS BY SEPA 1. All dcvelopment must pay a fee of�1,006.00 per PM peal: hour trip to fund system-wide transportation impro��ements. Por the approximately 607,300 square Ceet of building spacc proposed and dividcd among secen buildings a total traffic mitigation fee of about �524,126 must be paid to Uie City prior to issuance of permits. Pees will be distributed among the buildings and adjusted based on the size and use of the building actually proposed for construction. (SEPA Transportation Policies) id�Z3