2300 KASCH PARK RD 2018-01-01 MF Import

rianning commission �linutes • �larch 1, 1983 Page -2- ' Statf sees ttiis project as compatible with oroposed County land use and zoning. Surrounding uses include GTE• �faintenance Facility, Sno-Isle Vocational Ctr., Paine Field Airport, and Everett's Kasch Park. (They have been notified and have not rPsponded.) A SEPA Checklist has been circulated to the various City Departments for their response, and staff will then edit and refine the Staff Report to come back for a final decision. Herb Carpenter, of Reid Middleton Consulting, stated chat Communiry Transit is in general agreement with the staff, that CT intends to share :osts (sewer, water, electricity, etc.j for improvements with Kasch Park, and they intend to resolve any problems with the rezo�e contract pric+r to the next meeting with the Commission. Bob Landles, Environmental Coordinator, explained that there are three key issues: (1) screening for noise, (2) screening for light and glare, and (3) screening for aesthetics. Gerry Ervine sta;e-� that in the first phase of the project there is a 90 foot buffer along the access road; the second phase will sca:e it down to a 15 foot buffer. John Friel asked if this project is similar to the 8hend Rezone. Art answered that it is not, because Community Transit has a site ptan and a development time frame, which the Bhend project.didn't have. Ben Newland asked why the height limitation on buildings is 28 feet. Gerry answered that this is to prevent the buildings from unduly impacting the I nearby park, and staff is trying to he as specific as possible to insure predictobility a� to future deveiopment in the area. Jim GEniesse stated that this project seems to differ from the PID zoning desrribed in the Southwest Evereti Plan, and that the Commission needs to see the PID Ordinance to make decisions on projects. Gary Doughty answered that cumpletion of the PID Ordinance has not had top priority due to the annexation projects which must, by State law, be processed witliin a specific time. Tanis stated that the Commission would need two more meetings to make a decision on this, and also that they are concerned about the PID Ordinance being completed. It seems more reasonable to have the guidelines first and then process projects.