My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
500 LAUREL DR 2016-01-01 MF Import
>
Address Records
>
LAUREL DR
>
500
>
500 LAUREL DR 2016-01-01 MF Import
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2017 12:48:45 PM
Creation date
2/19/2017 1:37:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Address Document
Street Name
LAUREL DR
Street Number
500
Imported From Microfiche
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
152
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Geotechnical Engineering Study <br />00-2267 Three Story Addition - 500 Laurel Street, Everett <br />January 31, 2001 <br />L <br />Page 16 '" <br />dry weather any organic-free, compactible material meeting the above maximum <br />size criterion is acceptable for this purpose. <br />From our field observations it is our professional opinion that the majority of the in- <br />situ shallow soils (those materials likely to be excavated from the yard area) are <br />in a generally suitable condition for reuse as a structural fill. However, we strongly <br />urge that they be kept within about two points of the rriaterials' Modified Proctor <br />optimum moisture content to avoid the potential reaction likely in "moisture <br />sensitive" soils. <br />Fill Placement and Compaction: Structural fill under floor slabs and footings, in <br />utility trenches, or in driveway or parking area subgrades should be placed in thin <br />horizontal lifts not exceeding ten (10) inches in loose thickness for heavy <br />compactors and four inches for hand held compaction equipment. Each lift <br />should be compacted to a minimum of 95 percent of the maximum Modified <br />Proctor dry density, or to the applicable minimum City standard, whichever is the <br />more conservative. <br />As indicated above, to facilitate the earthwork and compaction process, the <br />earthwork contractor should place and compact fill materials at, or near (typically <br />within about two points), the optimum moisture content. 1'his should help enhance <br />t��e compactibility of the materials and avoid the risks involved with wet, moisture <br />sensitive soils. If fill materials are on the wet side of optimum they will need to be <br />dried to within about two points of the Modified Proctor optimum moisture content. <br />This can be accomplished relatively inexpensively by periodic windrowing and <br />aeration. <br />Native Subgrade Soil Density Testing: It is imporlant that the owner, and his <br />contractor, recognize that in-place density testing of the native subgrade soil is <br />unnecessary and inappropriate. If the native soil is tested it is virtually certain <br />that the results will indicate a"failing" degree of compaction. This does not <br />mean the native soil is unacceptabie for load bearing purposes, only that it is not <br />behaving in the same manner as a compacted structural fill. <br />Instead of performing in-situ density tests in the native soil it is usually preferable <br />to have the geotechnical engineer probe the subgrade with a sma(i diameter steel <br />rod. The magnitude of rod penetration, coupled with the engineers' visual <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.