My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
500 LAUREL DR 2016-01-01 MF Import
>
Address Records
>
LAUREL DR
>
500
>
500 LAUREL DR 2016-01-01 MF Import
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2017 12:48:45 PM
Creation date
2/19/2017 1:37:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Address Document
Street Name
LAUREL DR
Street Number
500
Imported From Microfiche
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
152
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Geotechnical Engineering Study Page 17 <br />00-2267 Three Story Addition - 500 Laurel Street, Everett <br />January 31, 2001 <br />evaluation of the exposed subgrade soil and his experience and engineering <br />judgement, is a reasonably accur�te determina+.or of the subgrade soils' <br />competency. <br />Impacts on Buried Structures: It is also important that no large or heavy <br />compaction equipment be used within about five feet of either a retaining or <br />basement wall, or any manhole or catch basin structure. If large equipment is used <br />in these areas there is a risk that excessive lateral pressures could be developed <br />and applied to the structure by the equipment. This could lead to damage to, if not <br />failure of, the structures. We recommend that a small walk-behind roller be used <br />in these areas, and that the fill be placed in loose lifts of no more than four inches <br />in thickness. Larger compaction equipment may be used beyond that point. <br />Fill Source Evaluation: In the event that fill materials are to be imported to the <br />site, or if on-site soils are to be reused as a fill, it will be necessary to evaluate the <br />potential till source before any material is removed and used. We recommend that <br />the geotechnical engineer be required tu visit each and every potential fill source <br />to obtain randomly selected representative samples of the potential sourre <br />materials. <br />These samples will then be submitted for laboratory testing to determine �he <br />material's maximum dry density and optimum moisture content. The sou,ce <br />materials should be tested in general accordance with the Modified Proctor test <br />methodology. The Maximum density and the optimum moisture ,ontent are then <br />used in the field as a gauge to determine the approximate degree of fill compaction <br />being achieved by the earthwork contractor. Depending on the general composition <br />of the source materials, a gradational analysis may be appropriate to determine <br />both the gravel and fines content. <br />Wet'Neather Construction: As indicated earlier, most of the in-place soils are, <br />because of the silt and clay sized fines content, considered to be "moisture <br />sensitive" in nature. This means that they should be expected to be difficult to <br />work or compact when wet, and that they should be expected to deteriorate <br />rapidly under even light pedestrian construction activity. <br />� To help reduce the potential negative impacts wet weather might have on these <br />soils we recommend that earthwork be performed in relatively small areas ta <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.