My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2106 GRAND AVE 2016-01-01 MF Import
>
Address Records
>
GRAND AVE
>
2106
>
2106 GRAND AVE 2016-01-01 MF Import
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/20/2017 6:14:03 PM
Creation date
2/20/2017 6:13:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Address Document
Street Name
GRAND AVE
Street Number
2106
Imported From Microfiche
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
194
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
( <br /> GEOTEOIINCAI ENGINEERING STLDY E•12863 <br /> r March 17,2007 <br /> 1 <br /> � Soldier Pile Wall Drainage. Horizontal joints between the lagging should be maintained to <br /> � allow water to seep through the shoring and reduce the potential for hydrostatic pressure to <br /> build up behind the shoring. The joint openings should be 1/16 to 1/8 inch wide. If permanent <br /> � basemen! walis or concrete facings are applied directly to the shoring wall, a continuous <br /> � geocomposite sheet drain incorporating a filter fabric such as Mira�G100W, or an approved <br /> equivalent, should be applied to the shoring wall prior to constructing the finished wall. The <br /> r sheet drain should be connected to a tightline drain installed along the base of the wall <br /> � and/or footing to collect and remove any seepage. A typical detail illustrating a sheet drain <br /> and tightline installation is included as "Shoring Wall Drainage," Plate 3. <br /> ISoldier Pile Installation. We understand that 6-inch flang width I-beam soldier piles with wood <br /> lagging will be used for the temporary shoring. The piles will be driven into place. We <br /> � anticipate a maximum temporary shoring wall of 14 feet with a 3-foot-high 1H:1V slope <br /> behind the wall. For a 14-foot-high wall, the piles should be imbedded 11 feet below the <br /> bottom of the excavation and spaced 5 feet on center. This design does not account for the <br /> I strengtl� of the pile. The strength of the pile should be reviewed by the project structural <br /> engineer. <br /> ; Foundations <br /> Based on the results of our study, in our opinion, the proposed building may be supported on <br /> Ia conventional spread and continuous footing foundation system bearing on competent <br /> native soil or stn�ctural fill. <br /> IExterior foundation elements should be placed at a minimum depth of 18 inches below final <br /> exterior grade for frost protection. Interior spread foundations can be placed at a minimum <br /> � depth of 12 inches below the top of siab, except in unheated �reas where interior foundation <br /> � elements should be founded at a minimum depth of 18 inches. Continuous and individual <br /> spread footings should have minimum widths �f 16 and 18 inches, respectively. <br /> � With foundation support obtained as described, for design, an allowable soil bearing capacity <br /> � of 3000 psf may be used for medium dense native soils or structural fill. Loading of this <br /> I magnitude would be provided with a theoretical factor-of-safety in excess of 3.0 against <br /> shear failure. For short-term dynamic loading conditions, a 1/3 increase in the above <br /> allowable bearing capacity can be used. <br /> � With structural loading as expected and provided the above design criteria are followed, total <br /> settlement of less ihan approximately 1 inch is anticipated, with differential settlement of <br /> I approximately 0.5 inch. Most of the anticipated setilement should occur during construction <br /> as dead loads are applied. <br /> ( <br /> ' <br /> i <br /> I EAR71-I CONSUlT1NG INCORPORATED �ar,e d <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.