2804 GRAND AVE SNO ISLE CO OP 2018-01-02 MF Import

west facade. The Applicant proposes to replace au existing six square-fiaol projecting sign on the westerly portion of the north facade of the building with an eight square -foot projecting sign of similar design of rusticated metal with aluminum trim and lettering. The two remaining proposed new projecting signs, similar in design of rusticated metal with aluminum trim and lettering, would be for the Food Co-op and are approximately 10 square -feet in area each; located on the easterly portion of the north fagade and the northerly portion of the cast fagade. Thee is no signage for the co-op on the north fagade. There is an existing awning sign on the cast fagade for Sno-Isle Co-np approximately 8 square -feet in area that is proposed to be retained. 'Ile awning sign and projecting sign combined would be approximately 18 square -feet. 'there are existing awning signs for Sisters Restaurant and Sound Holistic Health Clinic on the cast thgadc approximately 7.7 square -feet and 5.3 square -feet in area respectively that arc proposed to be retained. Conclusion: The proposed comprehensive sign design plan has a consistent design theme and manifests harmony with the buildings and property. 2. Whether the sign or signs promote the planned land use in the area of the subject properly and enhance the aesthetics of the surrounding area. Findings: The subject property is proposing new signage on site to modernize and give a new updated look that will compliment the building and existing signage. The rustic appearance and unobtrusive design of the signs will help promote and enhance the aesthetics already in place on the property and in the surrounding area. The proposed sign design plan promotes the planned use by facilitating modern identification of the facility in a functional and attractive manner. The proposed signs are approximately 55 percent under the total area allowed per code. The aesthetics of the surrounding area will be improved by adding more individualistic, pedestrian oriented signage. Conclusion: The proposed sign promotes updated identification of the facility, and will enhance the aesthetics of the building and the surrounding area. 3. Whether the signs and their placement obstruct or interfere with any other signs or property in the area or cbstruct natural scenic views. Findings: The ht.iposed sign design will be to replace two existing signs with new signs similar in square -rootage and to add two new additional signs of similar design. The signs will not extend above t',te roof line and the locations will not impact or interfere with scenic views or existing signage. Conclusion: The proposed signs will not obstruct or interfere with other signs or natural views. 4. Whether the proposed plan is aesthetically superior to what could he installed under existing criteria in this section. Findings: 13-3 signage regulations limits each business to one wall sign for each fagade, limits wall signage to a maximum 15 percent of the fagade e:ot to exceed 60 square -feel, and limits projecting signs to 24 square -feet. The application proposes to ' to front the one sign per business per fagade P 111 - c2�