My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6605 HARDESON RD BASE FILE 2016-01-01 MF Import
>
Address Records
>
HARDESON RD
>
6605
>
BASE FILE
>
6605 HARDESON RD BASE FILE 2016-01-01 MF Import
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2017 12:14:41 PM
Creation date
2/20/2017 11:05:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Address Document
Street Name
HARDESON RD
Street Number
6605
Tenant Name
BASE FILE
Imported From Microfiche
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
245
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Intracorp <br />'September 21, 1998 <br />. .,: <br />E-3592-720 <br />Pape 3 <br />No groundwater snepage was observed at any of our test pit locations, but the observed aoils <br />typicaliy became moist to wet at approximately four to five fee.*. below existiny yrade. In <br />addition, slight mottling and localized areas of iron oxide staining w�re observed. Based on <br />proposed finished grades and upon observed site conditions wQ do not anticipate groundwater <br />seepage will be encountered in site excavations. However, the contractor should be aware <br />that groundwater levels are not static. Groundwater levels can be expected to fluctuate <br />significantly depending on the season, amount of rainfall, surface water runoff, and other <br />factors. Generally, the groundwater level is higher in the wetter winter months (typically <br />October through May). The contractor should be prepared to control groundwater if seepage <br />is encountered in site excavations <br />:..:.. m <br />Laboratory tests were conducted on several representative soil samples to verify or modify <br />the field soil classification and to evaivate the general physical properties and engineering <br />characteristics of the soil encountered. Visual classifications were supplemented by grain size <br />analyses an representative samples. Moisture content tests were performed on all samples. <br />The results of laboratory tests performed on specific samples are provided either at the <br />appropriate sample depth on the indi✓idual test pit logs or on a separate data sheet contained <br />in Appendix B. It is important to note that these test resuits may not accurately represent the <br />overall in-situ soil conditions. Our geotechnical recommendations are based on our <br />interpretation of these test results and their use in guiding our engineering judgement. ECI <br />cannot be responsible for the interpretation of these data by others. <br />In accordance with our Standard Fee Schedule and General Conditions, the soil samples for <br />this project will be discarded after a period of fifteen days following completion of this report, <br />unless we are otherwise directed in writing. <br />. •. �,� ' •uu ��_ •. <br />General <br />Based on the results of our study, it is our apinion the proposed buiidings can be constructed <br />generally as planned. Building support can be provided us�ng conventionai spread and <br />continuous footing foundation systems bearing on competent native soil, or on structural fill <br />used to modify site grades. Slab-on-grade floors may be similarly supported. <br />This report has been prepared for specific application to this project only and in a manner <br />consistent with that level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by other members of our <br />profession currently practicing under similar conditions in this area for the exclusive use of <br />Intracorp, and their representatives. No warranty, expressed or implied, is made. This report, <br />in its entirety, should be included in the project �ontract documents for the information of the <br />contractor. <br />Euth Contuh�. Inc. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.