Laserfiche WebLink
Intracorp <br />Sep:ember 21, 1998 <br />: � : : � . � . � � � � . � � � � <br />E-3592-7Z0 <br />Page 4 <br />Since there is littte to no vegetation or topsoil on the ground surface, strippinp ia not <br />necessary other than for removal of material around the perimeter of the site, if necesaary. <br />Followinp any additional cuts required to provide design grades, the ground surface where <br />structural fill, foundations, or slabs are to be ptaced should be observed by a representative <br />of ECI. Priorto placing the site fills, the existing surface should be proofrotled and compacted <br />with a large vibratory drum roller. Loose or excessively soft areas identified by the roller <br />should be aerated during dry weather and be recompacted, or be overexcavated and replaced <br />with structural fill to a depth that will provide a stable base for the structural fifl. A woven <br />geotextile fabric may also be used to stabilize the overexcavation surface. For tttis <br />application, Mirafi 600X or approved equivalent should be used. Proofro�iinp should be <br />observed by a representative from ECI. <br />Structural fill is defined as compacted fill placed under bufldings, roadways, slabs, pavements, <br />or other load-bearing areas. Structural fill under floor slabs and footings should be placed in <br />horizontal lifts not exceeding twelve (12) inches in loose thickness and compacted to a <br />minimum of 90 percent of its laboratory maximum dry density determined in accordance with <br />ASTM Test Designation D-1557-91 (Modified Proctor). The fill materiais should be placed at <br />or near the optimum moisture contont. Fill under pavements and walks should also be placed <br />in horizontal lifts and compacted to 90 percent of maximum density except for the top twelve <br />(12) inches which should be compacted to 95 percent of maximum density. <br />During dry weather, most soils which are compact(ble and non-organic can be used as <br />structural fill, provided they are near their optimum moisture content. Based on the results <br />of our laboratory tests, the on-site soils at the time of our exploration appeared to be near the <br />optimum moisture content and should be suitable for use in their present condition as <br />structural fill. However, laboratory testing indicates that the soils encountered in the central <br />portion of the site in Test Pit TP-5 were comprised of approximately 50 percent fines passfng <br />the No. 200 sieve. Soils with, g�eater than five percent fines passing the No. 200 sieve will <br />degrade if exposed to excessive moisture, and compaction and erading will be difficult if the <br />soil moistures increase significantly above their optimum conditions. <br />If the site soils are exposed to moisture and cannot be adequately compacted, it may then be <br />necessary to import a soil which can be compacted. During dry weather, any non-organic <br />compactible soil can be used. Fill for use during wet weather should consist of a fairly weli <br />graded granular material having a maximum size of three inches and no more than five percent <br />fines passing the No. 200 sieve based on the minus 3/4inch fraction. A contingency in the <br />earthwork budget should be included for this possibility. <br />ErtA Cawk�n. Ma. <br />