7100 HARDESON RD 2016-01-01 MF Import

r� � FIIVDINCc Atvn GONCLUSIONS: The proposal is subject ro che general evaluation criteria lisced in Subsection 41.150.0 and the specific criteria listed in Subsection 41.150.D.1.a. of the Ciry's Zoning Code as follows: ia� �.- .� .� i - r� � i � � � � .�ii 1. The need of the ndQhborhood, dtctrlct, or City for a proposed special proPerty uu• Findiugs: Community Transit (C'1� provida transit service in Snohomish County and [he Ciry of Everett, with their primary service area being Snohomish Counry. �I'heir adminis[ra[ive offices are curtently located in Lynnwood. However, Community 1'ransit's opera[ions base is located on Hardeson Road in Everett. The proposal would consolidate che adminis[rative employees on the same site as operations and maintenance [o increasz efficiency and communication throughout the agency. Conclusions: The proposed use is a needed function in tbe City of Everett and Snohomish Counry as a whole. 2. The adequecy of streets, utilitia and public servkes required to serve a proposed use. Findings: Hardeson Road and access to the site is existing. Thero are three bridge crossings of Merrill and Ring Creek on the existing Communiry Transit site. The administrative offices would take access from the southernmost bridge crossing. A traffic analysis was completed as pa Everen/Paine Field Subarea Plan and EIS. The applicant is required to pay a fee �—' o 547,282. (S1.006 per PM peak hour trip) to fund system-wide transportation dh �3�-i t3"� i vemenu. See Exhibit 5, the Planned Action Detetmination. An analysis of utilities and public services was also compieted as part of the SN Everett/Paine Field Subarea Plan and EIS. The proposal falls within the impact thresholds identified in the EIS and Southwest Everett Subarea Plan Mitiga[ion Decision Document. Utilities are available in Hardeson Road and on the subject site. If feasible, utilities will bc extended from thc existing site. If this is not feasible, u[ilities may be obtained from Hardeson Road at the ezisting bridge crossing. Conclusion: The proposal would not have an adverse impact on the Ciry's street or utiliry systems. 3. The impact of tratttc generoted by the proposed use on t6e surrounding ares, pedesttian circWation and pubtic safery; and the abWty of the proponent to mitigate such potenUal impacts. Findings: Access to the administrative offices would be off of Hatdeson Road from an existing driveway/bridge crossing. Pedestrian walkways are proposed between the stra[ and the building. The proposal would separate pedestrian and public access from bus circulation on the si[e. Conclusion: The proposal will not result in a significant a�iverse impacts on traffic, pedestrian circulation, or public safety. 2