Laserfiche WebLink
� <br />� <br />�� <br />GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY <br />Trace and Associates <br />July 19: 2005 <br />Seismic Design Considerations <br />E-11880 <br />Page 10 <br />Earthquakes occur in the Puget Lowland with regularity; however, the majority of these <br />� events are of such low magnitude they are not felt withou� instruments. Large <br />earthquakes do occur, as indicated by the 1949, 7.2 magnitude earthquake in the <br />� Olympia area and the 1965, 6.5 magniiude earthquake in the Midway area and the <br />2001, 6.8 magnituda earthquake in the Nisqually area. <br />� <br />� <br />� <br />� <br />� <br />� <br />� <br />� <br />� <br />� <br />� <br />� <br />� <br />There are 3 potential geologic hazards associated with a strong motion seismic event <br />at this site: ground rupture, liquefaction, and ground motion response. <br />Ground Rupture <br />The strongest eartliquakes in the Puget Lowland are widespread, subcrustal events, <br />ranging in depth from 30 to 55 miles. Surface faulting from these deep events has not <br />been documented to date. Therefore, it is our opinion that the risk of ground rupture at <br />this site during a strong motion seismic event is negligible. <br />Liquefaction <br />Liquefaction is a phenomenon in which soils lose all shear strength for short periods of <br />time during an earthquake. Groundshaking of sufficient duration resuits in the loss of <br />grain-to-grain contact and rapid increase in pore water pressure, causing the soil to <br />behave as a fluid. To have a potential for liquefaction, a soil must be cohesionless with <br />a grain size distribution of a specified range (generally sand and siltl; it must be loose; <br />it must be below the groundwater table; and it must be subject to sufficient magnitude <br />and duration of groundshaking. The effects of liquefaction may be large total and/or <br />differential settlement tor structures founded in the liquefying soils. <br />In our opinion, the potential for widespread liquefaction-induced settlement at this site <br />is negligible. This conclusion is based the generally medium dense condition of the site <br />soils at depth, and the presence of only localized zones of light seepage. <br />Ground Motion Response <br />Tl�e 2003 /nternational Building Code (IBC) regulations contain a static force procedure <br />and a dynarnic force procedure for design-base shear calculations. Based on the <br />encountered soil conditions, it is our opinion Site Class D, Stiff Soi/ Profile, as defined <br />in Table 1615.1.1 sliould be used to characterize the site soils. <br />Eanh Consut�anis, Inc. <br />