1123 RAINIER AVE 2018-01-01 MF Import

J 4. The sut�ect property is proposed for lot 2 of a short subdivision that waa approved by the City of Everett in 1992 (Short Plat No. 5-92). Because of the time frame between the short plat approval of 1992 and the current requested action of the Applicant, a formal plat review process is required. (Staf( report) 5. The proposed subdivision will cxeate three additional lots on lot 2. The lots have been identified on the plat map as lots 2A, 2B, and 2C. It is the intent of the Applicant to develop lot 2A with 50 multiple-family units as pa►t of Phase 1 of the proposed project. The remaining two lots are to be deve�oped at a later date when money becomes available. (Staff report, Fancher testimony) 6. The proposed development, which will house senior citizens, will provide a safe environment for the residents of this community and be beneficial to the ge�eral welfare. Because of the open space on-aite and the close proximity to other residentiai uses, as well es oommerciel uses, it is in the general welfare of the public to approve the proposal. 7. The Planning Departrnent of the City of Everett reviewed the proposel and determined it to be consistent with the zoning development standard for R�, Multiple-Family Residential, designated properties. With the exception ot the parking standards addressed in the varianoe requeat findinga, the site can be developed without any variations from the standarda. (Staff report, Wood testimony) 8. Evaluations of any potential impacts ta the e�vironment as a result of the proposal have been conducted as part of the SEPA review. The City of Everett was designated as the lead aflency for review of the environment. On October 22, 1996, the City iasued a 8nal Mitigated Determination of Non-Signficance (MDNS), and no appeals of this threahold detertnination wsrs mads. (Exhibit 7) 9. The site is flat and hes an existing building on the lot line ot proposed lota 28 and 2C. It is the intent of the Applicant to eventually move this buildin�. However, the Applicant does not deaire to move the building until building permits for lots 2B and 2C are seared. The City submitted that the building could remain straddling the two lots until the final plat oF the siM was approved. No building pertnits could be issued for lots 28 end 2C without the removal of the building. (Staff report, Wood testimony) 10. There are no environmentally sensitive features on-sita. (Staff report) 11. M evaluation of all dreinege impacts and provisiona for mitigetion of theae impects will be made. Drainage improvements will be required on the subje� property's frontage and will be reviewed by the Everelt Public Works Department. (Staff report) 3