My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6600 MERRILL CREEK PKY BLDG A SHELL 2016-01-01 MF Import
>
Address Records
>
MERRILL CREEK PKY
>
6600
>
BLDG A SHELL
>
6600 MERRILL CREEK PKY BLDG A SHELL 2016-01-01 MF Import
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/22/2017 10:58:39 AM
Creation date
2/25/2017 11:21:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Address Document
Street Name
MERRILL CREEK PKY
Street Number
6600
Tenant Name
BLDG A SHELL
Imported From Microfiche
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
193
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
. <br /> II <br /> 8.6 PUI3LIC WATER SUPPLIES I, <br /> 5.6.1 Threshold � <br /> , <br /> The analysis in the Water Svsrem Plan projected the overall future peak-hour dema�id for the area at 2.7 <br /> I <br /> gpm/acre (approximately 4,000 gpa/day peak flow), and assumed fire flow requirements of ; <br /> approximately 3,500 gpm for commercial and industrial/manufacturing uses. Based upon the proposed � <br /> design of the water system, any development using more than 2.7 g,pm/acre has the potential to affect <br /> �vater pressure on other sites. Additional analysis will be required ior development proposals with a � <br /> peak hour dcmand above 2.7 gpm/acrc and/or a fire tlow requirement of 3,500 gpm or greater. The i <br /> additional analysis may be as simple as calculations completed by the Public Works DepaRment prior <br /> to a pre-application meeting on a specific dcvelopment proposal. The additional analysis must , <br /> determine how the proposaPs water demand will afCect the entire water supply and distribution system. <br /> Projects with no additional major improvements nceded and no adverse cumalative impacts on the <br /> water suppty and distribution system are covered by this analysis. <br /> The 2.7 gpm/acre is an overall average peak hour demand assumed for planning in large azeas such as <br /> the study area. Ho�vever, there will undoubtedly be site-specific proposals with larger demand. For <br /> example, lazge irrigation systems can exceed 50 gpm/acre demand. Other land uses with demands <br /> much lower than 2.7 gpm/acre, such as warehouses, are assumed to occur to offset the higher demand i <br /> land uscs, resultir.g in an overall area wide average of 2.7 gpn�/acre. � <br /> The impacts of construction oCthe new water line to service development west of Japanese Gulch �•�ere <br /> not covered in the EIS. Additional SEPA analysis is required ro revieri altemative routes for the line <br /> �vhich will minimize the impacts of the p�oposal. � <br /> 8.G.3 Mitigation Mcasures � <br /> l. Looped water mains may be required for some sites to meet fire ilow requirements and to protect <br /> warer quality. Pressure reducing valves may be required when looped systems are constructed. <br /> (SEPA Public Services and Utilities Policies) i <br /> 2. Developments must construct improvements necessary to provide a water pressure of 40-80 psi <br /> under normal operating conditions as required by Public Works. (SEPA Public Services and <br /> Utilities Policies) <br /> 3. Recycling of runoff water from bus or truck�vashing (acilitics is required. (SEPA F'ublic Services <br /> and Utilities Policies) <br /> 4. Ne�v water system facilitics must avoid environmentally sensitive areas to the maximum extent <br /> possible. Where water lines must be constructed through environmentally sensitive areas,best <br /> management practices must be followed. (Sec tlie mitigation measures discussed in Section 4) <br /> (SGPA Earth, Watcr, and Plant and Animal Policies) <br /> 17 <br /> i <br /> � <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.