My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1921 W MUKILTEO BLVD 2018-01-02 MF Import
>
Address Records
>
W MUKILTEO BLVD
>
1921
>
1921 W MUKILTEO BLVD 2018-01-02 MF Import
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/22/2022 12:42:56 PM
Creation date
2/26/2017 3:32:21 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Address Document
Street Name
W MUKILTEO BLVD
Street Number
1921
Imported From Microfiche
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
96
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Evaluation <br />1919 Mukilteo Boulevard <br />October 20, 2005 <br />NGA File No. 718805 <br />Page 3 <br />■ drill rig. Hand auger and hand hole explorations were excavated during slope mapping at the site on <br />August 18, 2005. The approximate locations of our explorations are shown on Figure 2. <br />An engineer from NGA was present during the explorations, examined the soils and geologic conditions <br />encountered, obtained samples of the different soil types, and maintained logs of the explorations. A <br />Standard Penetration Test (SPT) was performed on each of the samples during drilling to document soil <br />density at depth. The SPT consists of driving a 2-inch outer -diameter, split -spoon sampler 18 inches <br />using a 14U-pound hammer with a drop of 30 inches. The number of blows required to drive the sampler <br />the final 12 inches is referred to as the "N" value and is presented on the boring logs. The N value is used <br />to evaluate the strength and density of the deposit. <br />The soils were visually classified in general accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System, <br />[ presented in Figure 4. The logs of our borings are attached to this report and are presented as Figures 5 <br />through 7. The logs of our hand tool explorations are attached to this report and are presented as Figures <br />8 and 9. We present a brief summary of the subsurface conditions in the following naragraphs. For a <br />detailed description of the subsurface conditions, the boring logs should be reviewed. <br />Each of the borings exposed loose, silty fine sand with abundant organics extending to one foot below the <br />existing surface. We interpreted this material to be topsoil. Belov, the topsoil each of the borings <br />I: encountered loose fine to medium sand with silt and varying amounts of gravel extending between five to <br />ten feet below the existing surface. Below the loose sand, each of the borings encountered medium dense, <br />silty fine to coarse sand and sand with silt and varying amounts of gravel extending to depths of <br />approximately 15 to 20 feet. Underlying the medium dense soil, each of the explorations encountered <br />I'• dense to very dense fine to coarse sand with silt and gravel. All three of the borings were terminated in <br />f dense to very dense sand at depths between 29.0 and 48.0 feet below the existing ground surface. <br />I; <br />Hand Auger 1, located along the top of the steep slope in the eastern portion of the site, encountered <br />(, loose, silty fine to medium sand extending to 3.0 feet below the existing surface. Below the silty sand, <br />f <br />HA-1 encountered loose to medium dense, fine to coarse sand with varying amounts of silt and gravel <br />extending to the depth explored at 8.2 feet. <br />NELSON GEOTECHNICAL ASSOCIATES, INC. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.