Laserfiche WebLink
i <br /> SHANNON F�WILSON,INC. <br /> I <br /> would be required in building areas, as these soils may not prwide suitable foundadon <br /> Isupport for footings and floor slabs. Fill soils should be strippad because they were <br /> observed to contain wood debris and other organic and deleterious materials and there is no <br /> idocumentation of compacdve effort. Also, Sll cavers up to 24 inches of original oiganic- <br /> rich wpsoil materials in a number of explorations. Both wndidons could cause lacger than <br /> I expected settlements of footings or slabs. Additionally, based on our experience on similaz <br /> sibes, it is our opinion that at least a portion of the weathered nadve soils will have ro be <br /> removed, as these soils were generally loose and wet. It may be possible to stabilize the <br /> Ilrnver 1 faot of these soils by aeretion or cement/lime modification. However, if the dme <br /> frdme for construction is such that scarificadon, aera6on, or soil modifica6on is not <br /> Ipossible, it should be ezpected that all of this material will have to be remvved, as it is <br /> easily disturbed and cannot be adequately proof-m11ed or compacted in place. Additionally, <br /> � because the building will be constructed partially in cut and partially in fill materials, the <br /> I <br /> possibility of sharp, differendal settlement will increase if soft soils are left beneath the <br /> I building. Estimated depths to glacial soils (assuming all weathered native soils aze remaved) <br /> are indicated on Figure 1. <br /> IAs shown on Figure 1, the total depth of stripping and wereaccavation is <br /> an6cipated less than 3 feet for most areas. However, two areas of deep, unsuihable soils <br /> Iwere observed in our explordtions. The first area is in the southeast wrner of the site near <br /> the stockpiled soils. Fill depths aze expected W be as great as 12 feet belaw ground sudace <br /> (greater when wnsidering the depths from the top of the stockpiles in the area). However, <br /> we understand that 20-foot cuts are planned in the area as part of site devclopment, such that <br /> I all fill materials would be remwed by the time the final grdde is reached. The second area <br /> of deep, unsuihable soils is in the southwest corner of the site where no development is <br /> Iplanned. Therefore, stripping and werexcavation would not be required he�e. <br /> As part of development by the previous owner, a number of wetlands we�e <br /> Ifilled and Narbeck Creek relocated. We recommend that, if possible, the original locations <br /> of the wetland and the creek be identified, since these areas would probably contain loose, <br /> � soft, organic, or otherwise unsuitable soils. Should such areas be identi6ed during site <br /> preparation to lie within the proposed building areas, they would nced to be werexcavated <br /> I and replaced wiih compacted sWctural fill. Should such amas lie within the proposed <br /> par!dng and drive areas, they would nced to be proof-mlled and checked for the presence of <br /> I W-6693-01 <br /> 16 <br /> � <br />