Laserfiche WebLink
• ( ( <br /> Conclusions: Adequate provisions for access, utilities and public services for the <br /> proposal can be accommodated. <br /> 3. The impact of traffic ganerated by the propostd use on the surcounding area, <br /> pedestrian circulation and pubflc safety; and the ability oc the proponent to mitigate <br /> such potential impacts. <br /> Finding: The proposal should not generate any additional traffic than currently exists. <br /> The proposed church use will operate on average two times a week, typically Sunday ` <br /> mornings, and one weekday evening. i <br /> Conclusion: No adverse impacts to tra�c are anticipated as a result of the proposal. <br /> 4. The provision of adequate off-street parking, on-site circulation, and site access. <br /> � <br /> Finding: The site is developed with an existing 961 square foot structure, plus a 3- � <br /> bedroom 1,300 square foot residence and a detached garage. The residence and <br /> detached garage are located to the north of the subject structure and separated from the <br /> subject structure by a fence; however all three structures are located on the same lot. The <br /> residential structure is required to provide a minimum of 2 off-street parking stalis, which <br /> are currently provided off of the alley. The church facility is required to provide a minimum j <br /> of 1 parking stall per every five seats in the church or nave. It appears a maximum of 8 <br /> parking stalls is provided for on site. This parking area will need to be improved to meet <br /> City zoning code and City design and construction standards. <br /> Conclusion: The site has adequate parking for the proposal. Permits will be required for <br /> the parking lot improvements. <br /> 5. Compatibility of proposed structures and improvements with surrounding <br /> properties, including the size, hetght, location, setback and arrangement of all <br /> proposed buildings and facilities, especialiy as they relate to light and shadow <br /> impacts on more sensitive land uses and less intensive zones. <br /> Finding: The structure was previously used for a church facility for approximately 20 <br /> years. The City approved the conversion of the structure to a retail ceramic shop on <br /> August S, 1985. Subsequent to the ceramic shop the structure was used for several other <br /> commercial uses, which were not approved by the city. No exterior building alterations are <br /> proposed at this time. The structure is relatively small and has the outward appearance of <br /> being residential in nature. <br /> Conclusion: The proposal is not anticipated to have any adverse impacts on the <br /> surrounding properties. <br /> 6. The number, size and location of signs, especially as they relate to more sensitive <br /> land uses. <br /> Finding: The applicant has stated that they would like to attach a sign to the front of the <br /> buiiding. A separate sign application is required and will be reviewed separately from the <br /> special property use permit review. Signage in this zone is limited to non-intemally <br /> 76 <br />