1132 E MARINE VIEW DR 2016-01-01 MF Import

' ( ( ; illuminated signs and the standards contained in Chapter 36 of the Zoning Code as � ; outlined below: . Wall signs are permitted at a size of 42 square feet or fifteen percent of the fa�ade upon which the sign will sit not to exceed sixty square feet. Projecting and roof mounted signs are prohibited; • Freestanding signs shall be limited to one sign per frontage and shall not exceed 32 square feet in area nor exceed ten feet in height. Height is dependent upon setback from the property line. � Conclusion: A sign permit is required for review and approval for any signage proposed on the building. 7. The landscaping, buffering and screening of buildings, parking, Ioading and storage areas, especially as they relate to more sensitive la : uses. Findings: There is a minimal amount of landscaping on site, typically associated with residential structures. It appears that the subject structure is located on both the eastem and southern property lines. The site has been used both as a church and retail � establishment over the past forty years. If improvements made to the site as a result of the proposal equal 35% or more of the buildings assessed valuation, additional landscaping may be required. There does appear to be areas to the north of the subjec' residence and parking area where additional plantings could be made to help soften the appearance of the commercial parking lot on the residential neighborhood. Conclusions: Residential landscaping exists on the site already. Additional landscaping may be required during the building permit process. 8. The generation of nuisance irritants such as noise, smoke, dust, odor, glare, visual blight or othe: undesirable impacts. Finding: The proposed use will not result in any additional nuisance impacts than currently exists, other than those commonly associated with building remodel and parking lot improvements. These impacts will be temporary in nature, and will be mitigated through good building practices. Conclusion: No noise, smoke, dust, odor, glare, visual blight or other undesirable impacts are anticipated as a result of the proposal. 9. Consistency with the goals and policies of the Everett General Plan for the area and land use designation in which the property is located. Finding; The site is designated 1.3 Single Family Detached on the City of Everett's Comprehensive Plan map. Conclusion: The Comprehensive Plan for the City states that essential public facilities shall be located so as to provide the necessary service to the intended users of the facility with the least amount of impact on surrounding uses. The proposed use is consistent with these Comprehensive Plan policies. 7�O