My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
3434 MCDOUGALL AVE 2018-01-02 MF Import
>
Address Records
>
MCDOUGALL AVE
>
3434
>
3434 MCDOUGALL AVE 2018-01-02 MF Import
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/23/2022 2:54:28 PM
Creation date
2/26/2017 5:55:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Address Document
Street Name
MCDOUGALL AVE
Street Number
3434
Imported From Microfiche
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
167
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
transit is not a significant criterion with this project. (Exhibit 1, Landles i <br />testimony) <br />26. The proposed use has been reviewed by the Everett Planning <br />Department and has boen found to be consistent with the development <br />and use standards as set forth in the Everett Zoning Code. The <br />proposal is consistent with the criteria of EMC 19.41.150.C&D and the <br />land use standards for the C-2, Heavy Commercial and Light Industrial <br />zoning designation. (Exhibit 1, Landles testimony) <br />27. A spokesman for Crown Distributing Company, Inc. (Crown) submitted <br />opposition testimony regarding the application for the Special Property <br />Use Permit. Crown, a distributor of wholesale beverages that <br />specializes in the distribution of Anheuser Busch products, is located <br />across a street from the proposed facility. According to Crown, its <br />ventilation, heating and cooling systems are subject to contaminants that <br />diminish the effectiveness and operation of the systems, and the <br />proposed facility could create these contaminates and threaten Crown's <br />operation. (Exhibit 28) <br />28. A "Minimum Risk Waste Facility" in the City of Everett is not defined in <br />the Everett Municipal Code or the revised codes of Washington (RCW). <br />However, according to Crown's legal counsel, the statutory definition of �y <br />"moderate risk waste" is, "any waste that exhibits any of the properties of <br />hazardous wastes but is exempt from regulation under (RCW Chapter <br />70.105) solely because the waste is generated in quantities below the <br />threshold for regulation"and "any household wastes which are <br />generated from the disposal of substances identified by the (Washington <br />Department of Ecology) as hazardous household substances." Counsel <br />fir Crown contended that the proposed facility is a moderate risk waste <br />facility and not a minkmom risk waste facility and, therefore, not a <br />permitted use in the C-2 zone. <br />According to Crown, the wastes to be generated on -site would be those <br />from substances identified as hazardous household substances and <br />would be moderate risk wastes. This definition would preclude them <br />from being categorized as minimum risk wastes and, therefore, would <br />not be an allowed use in the C-2 zone. (Exhibit 28, Jones testimony) <br />Jurisdiction: The Hearing Examiner of the City of Everett has jurisdictional <br />authority to hold a hearing and to issue the decision. That tuthonty is set forth <br />in EMC 2.23.120. Based on the above findings, the Hearing Examiner enters <br />the following conclusions: <br />10 �, <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.