1922 W MARINE VIEW DR 2016-01-01 MF Import

Planning Commission Minutes August 11, 1981 Page -2- Condition 1�4: First para. Same. a. The horton Avenue frontage from 16th to 21st Street. b. The parking areas. (Buffer south, east and west sides of site prior to use.) Condition �i18: That a complete traffic analysis by a qualified traffic consultant will be required indicating number of trips per hour, direction of flow, access points on a more iecific site plan, and am� control measures that wuuld mitigate traffic impacts to the satisfaction of the City Transportation Engineer. //19: That any control improvements necessary to rnitigate traffic impacts shall be provided by Parsons. �120: 1'hat street improvements in conformance with Ordinance 555-78 are required. - . ' #21: That peak employment shal! occur normally during winter/spring months and shall utilize a portion of the marina parking or there shall be additionai parking provided by Parson's to minimize the conflicts between the Parson's employees and the boating public. There shall be a review of the parking activity before the Planning Commission in September of 1983 to insure that adequate parking is provided. If a shortage is discovered, then additional parking shall be provided by Parson's in a manner and qUantity approved by the Transportotion Engineer. 1122: The 4.5 acre parking lot at the east end of the Marina shall be fully paved prior to use as Parson's Employee parking. � Applicant: Lou Switchenback, representing Parsons Mr. Switchenback gave a presentation with slides of the entire process of the , manufacturing and shipping of the gas units. He stated that the Applicant hasn't � reviewed the new changes to the Staff Report and is not prepared yet to commit themselves. Jim Geniesse suggested that they go through the conditions now. A.r. Switchenback stated that Condition 2 could create .: problem, and after discussion it was agreed to reword it to state "... of all permanent buildings shall be oriented...". • Mr. Switche��batk stated that he is unsure about Condition 5. Mr. Belford of the Port sieNped forward and staied that he believes the pedestrian and bike path was an agreement b�tween the Port and the City an� that Parsor.s shouldn't be encumbered with it. After extensive discussion, No. 5 was deleted and added to Condition 20. Mr. Switchenback stated that the requirements of Condition 6 were a bit strict, and after discussion it was agreed to reword it to read, "That the applicant shall comply with appropriate State and City noise regulations." r ;i��.+'�,.„�.�_� - 2.. Rb�r�'"�'�'�lY d+":. .. .