Laserfiche WebLink
b. Canclnsinn-,- There are exceptional or extraordinary <br />circumstances regarding the location of the existing <br />structures and the lot size which were established prior to <br />the City's Zoning Code. <br />Criterinn No 2- <br />That the variance will not be materially detrimental to the property <br />in the area of the subject property or to the City as a whole. <br />a. Findings- No written adverse comments have been received at <br />this time. <br />b. Cnnclnsinn-,- The variance should not be materially <br />detrimental to the property in the area of the subject <br />property or to the City as a whole. <br />Criterion No 3 <br />That the variance will only grant the subject property the same <br />general rights enjoyed by other property in the same area and zone <br />as the subject property. <br />a. Fin, dings: The adjacent properties are developed with <br />residential structures which were built in the early 19oo's, <br />many of which do not meet current setback requirements. <br />b. Conclusion-,- The variance will grant the subject, property the <br />same rights enjoyed by other existing properties in the same <br />zone as the subject property. <br />Criterion No 4- <br />That the variance is the minimum necessary to allow the subject <br />property the general rights described in Criterion 3. <br />a. Findings: See Criteria #3. <br />b. Cann Iuainns- The variance is the minimum necessary to allow <br />the subject property the general rights describe in Criterion <br />3. <br />Criterion No. 5- <br />The granting of the variance is not inconsistent with the goals and <br />policies of the Everett General Plan. <br />a. Fin--d,�s: The Everett General Plan designates this property <br />as 1.5 Multiple Family Fesidential. <br />b. Conclusions- The granting of the variance is not inconsistent <br />with the goals and policies of the Everett General Plan. <br />