My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
615 ROSS AVE 2018-01-02 MF Import
>
Address Records
>
ROSS AVE
>
615
>
615 ROSS AVE 2018-01-02 MF Import
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/22/2022 10:28:11 AM
Creation date
2/27/2017 2:56:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Address Document
Street Name
ROSS AVE
Street Number
615
Imported From Microfiche
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
126
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
pliance with the conditions attached hcreto which are incorporated by <br />reference as if fully set fortli herein. <br />This DNS is issued under 197-11-74b(2): the lead agency will not act <br />on this proposal for 15 days from the date below. Comments must be <br />submitted by July 14, 1990 or tifteen (15) duys after the dote shotm <br />on the noterized copy of the notice of posting, whichever date is lat- <br />er. <br />Responsible Olficial: Paul A. Roberts <br />Title: �irect�r oE Planning <br />and Community Development <br />Address: City Ifall, Everett, f�A 98201 <br />Date: .Tune 29 1990 J � c� <br />,:� ' - � ���/1 <br />Signature: �-'-�`, �.-�' r��'L <br />You may appeal this determination to the City Clerk nt City Hall, 3002 <br />Wetmore Avenue no later than 10 days from the date the DNS becomeF f1- <br />nal (which is after the 15 day comment period) by submitting a written <br />statement requesting an appeal which sets forth the name and address <br />of the person aggrieved and a clear and concise statement of the <br />grounds for the appeal. You should be prepared to make spectfic fac- <br />tual objections. <br />Contact Bob Landles to read or ask about the procedures for SEPA ap- <br />poals. <br />NOTE: A UNS may 6e withdrawn in the event of significant changes in <br />the proposal, disclosure of new significant 3.nformation, misrepresen- <br />tation by the applicant, or failure to com�ly with the conditions upon <br />which this Determination of Non-Significance is predicated. <br />7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.