5416 S 1ST AVE 2018-01-02 MF Import

Maltby Tank & Barge Rezone 3-64 Page -6- 30. Should any of the northern portion of the subject property be developed, the City of Everett has reserved the right to impose engineering requirements. 31. The Applicant testified to be in agreement with the recommendation for the proposed rezone. In addition, the Applicant testified to be in total agreement with the Concomitant Agreement for the development of the southern portion of the proposed rezone. 32. A witness (Chism) testified that parking is a problem on Lenora and South First Avenue. The witness was concerned wh:?cher the development of the southern portion of. the subject property would create additional parking. The Applicant testified that the structure will not create any additional parking problems in the area and will alleviate many of the existing problems by providing a more orderly system of parking for administrative workers of the Applicant. 33. The witi,ess (Chism) requested that the Applicant be prohibited from conducting any retail sales or similar activity of pornographic materials on' land that is subject of the rezone. 34. The witness (Chism) testified to be a representative of the Lowell Civic Association. Another witness (Spurling) is also a member of the Lowell Civic Association. 35. The witness (Spurling) requested that- a bicycle path be included as part of the landscaping of the subject property as it fronts Lenora. According to the witness, a significant portion of surrounding properties are part of a bicycle path that will be developed in the summer of 1984. The extension of the path in fr,)nt of the Applicant's property is a benefit to the community a -id to the Applicant. 36. The Applicant testified to be in support of the recommendation of the witness (Spurling) that the bicycle path be part of the landscaping. The City of Everett had no comment on the bicycle path. Subsequent to the, hearing, the Everett Public Works Department submitted that the widening of Lenora to include a bicycle path and to provide for adequate vehicle and pedestrian movement was acceptable to the City of Everett. 37. No adverse testimony was received on the requested rezone.