5512 S 1ST AVE 2016-01-01 MF Import

� � BOlBD OF AD.TIISTI�NT FINDINGS� CONCLIISIONS AND OHDEP. (Dennia V. Diedrich; 920-84) , Based upon the vrit��n request for a varSance from th� City's zoning code, apecificallq EMC 19.16.030, made by Dennie V. Diedrich, hereinafter referred to ae "Applicant," the Board of Adjuetment held a public hearing on said application on September 10, 1984. Following said hearing, a motion vas made and aeconded to grant ehe variance requeat. Board members Wilson anfl Zook voted for the granting of the variance vhile board membere Miller and Hoagland voted againet granting ehe variance. The basis for the board members voting againe[ the granting of the variance ia ae f�l]ovs: 1. There are no eaceptional or extraordinary circumstancee or conditione apglying to the subjec[ property or as to the Sntended uae thereof, that do not apply generally to other properties in the same vicinity or zone: a. b. Findinge: The Applicant ovne a parcel of property which ie located at 5512 Sauth Pirst Street, Evarett. The Applicant'e property consieta of a 6,000 aquare foot lot vt:ich is zoned R-2. 'fhe R-2 zone allow eingle faaily reeidence� to be located oz 5,009 equare foot lote aad duplexes to be located on 7,500 aquare foot lote (EMC 19.16.030). The o[her lote in Applicant'e block have single family reeidences on them. Applicant's property contaSne no conditione euch ae eha�e or topographical location which are unique to hia lot. Applicant ia eeeking a variance to allow a duplex on a 6,000 equare foot lota. The Applicant hae a eingle familq etruct��re on the sut property vhich hae been comet:ed to a triplex and is curre being used as a duplex. The convereione by the Applicant of structure in queation took place rrlthout the required permita. Concluaione: The Applicant's property doea not contain any physical conditione or circumetances unique to hie property for which a variance can be graneed. Applicant's current use ie in violation of the City's zoning code. The only hardahip which the applicant hae demonatrated is due to the fect that Ue now ia operating a duplex etructure vhere such ie not permitT.ed unlesa Lhe Applicaat has a lot of 7,500 square feet or larger. But thia cannot be conaidered an exceptianal or extraordinary circ�matance becauae the only reasan the Applicant ia in thia situation is [hat he has not complied w7.th the City ordinances. This conatitutes a aelf-created hardehip which does not constitute undue hardship for purposes of the City's zoning code. -1- ROUTING !^J— ��t�HRv ��f-9—iJ MS. DENT __ i i�_': �.—DOUG / l. �J C'j 1FCK _ . ;n,��Ji�1�l��-� F�Eo __ �; rr�onM ��.LIL C; Euuicc ��1(� (�BRIPN ��I,II _ [�SUG �U__��- 7 �� ` —y___"'____ a