Laserfiche WebLink
Meeting Minutes <br />WMFL Project No. 8105.02 <br />Page 3 <br />January 27, 198a <br />Item =14: (a) Housing module design (mezzanine with 2-story dayroom) is <br />acceptable. The dayroom areas are provided with a smoke <br />exhaust system that meets Jail Commission standards. (b) <br />Outdoor recreation areas are okay as designed. <br />Item #26: Okay. Safety glazing will be identified in accordance with <br />Section 5402. <br />Exit Comments <br />Item #1: Okay. Stair systems as designed are acceptable without <br />smoke roof enclosure vestibules. The 1982 UBC (Section <br />3310(M allows smokeproof enclosures to be omitted, provided <br />all enclosed exit stairways are equipped with a dampered <br />relief opening at the top and the stairway is supplied mechan- <br />ically with sufficient air to meet UBC standards. <br />Item #2: Okay. Security demands alternates. <br />Item #3: Okay. Security screen over outdoor recreation areas on Level <br />5 is acceptable. <br />Item #7: Okay. Booking area design is acceptable. It was felt that <br />— - requiring the area to be redesigned to meet 1-hour exit <br />corridor requirements would compromise the security and <br />function of the booking/intake area. <br />Item #8: (b) The central exit stair integrity is violated by having <br />door #172 exit into an unprotected area of the building. It <br />was decided to resolve this problem by either moving door #172 <br />to the outside face of the building or changing door #156 to <br />11-hour fire rated assembly with 2-hour wall protection on <br />each side of the door. WMFL will discuss the alternatives and <br />decide the optimum solution. A change order will be required. <br />(c) The stair barrier gate will be moved to provide a <br />landing. Change order required. <br />Item #12: Okay. Doors opening into corridors #529 and 544 are accept- <br />able for security reasons. The individual rooms are ac- <br />cessible to inmates and doors swinging out of the rooms <br />precludes inmates barricading themselves into the room and <br />preventing staff access. <br />MECHANICAL: <br />The items discussed in this section were the result of the ICBO review <br />dated January 10, 1984 and the response from HNTB dated January 17, <br />1984. <br />