Laserfiche WebLink
( Geotxhnical Engincering RepoR <br /> ' Gardener Group Condominiums <br /> ( July 16, 1997 <br /> NCA File No.209297 <br /> Page 8 <br /> � compacteble condition is not feasible. All compaction should be accomplished by equipment of a type <br /> I and size su�cient to attain the desired degra of compaction. Care should be taken when applying <br /> compaction erer� so that there is not damege to adjacent shucturos. Our experience is that large <br /> � compaction equipment mey not structurally damage adjacent structures, but they can cause cosmetic <br /> cracking or at the least, annoyance to adjacent structures. We recomme�id that photographs of adjacent <br /> sWcturea be taken prior to construction to document eny existing cracks. The use of small hand <br /> foperated compaction equipment should be wnsidered. <br /> ( ExcavaHon ConsideraHons <br /> Genenl: The excavation as planned will place the adjacent structures at risk. 7'he amount of risk <br /> � depends on the type of soils at foundation depth. [f the foundations are close to or on unweathered till <br /> the risk would be less that if severel feet of loose fill exists behveen the till and the foundation. The <br /> � minimal risk solution would be to use a soldier pile wall along that poRion of the excevation where the <br /> adjacent structures exist. Altemative solutions would be to use an ecology block shoring wall and/or <br /> excavation slopes and some underpinning of the adjacent structures. <br /> � The ecology block solution requires that a temporary oversteepened excavation be made and the blocks <br /> placed immediately following the excavation. One way to evaluate this is to excavate the site with <br /> ( _ setbacks from the property line. The behavior of the soils exposed could be evaluated prior to excavating <br /> near the property line. If it appears successful,slot excavations on the order of]0 fat in lenglh could�: <br /> ( made and the wall constructed in sections. If the soils ravel and slough excessively,the soldier pile wall <br /> could be installed. In any event, if the slot cuts are used,the owner should be prepated to fix any repairs <br /> Ldue to settlement of the adjacent structures. This is We even if the less risky soldier pile wall is <br /> constructed. <br /> ( The ecology block wall should be designed as a gravity wall. The temporary shoring walls should be <br /> designed using the parameters outlined in the retaining wall section of this report. Building surcharges <br /> � should be used when designing the wall systems. <br /> � Building Foundations <br /> Conventional spread or continuous foundations should bear on the mediwn dense to very dense glaciel I <br /> till, or structural fill extending to these soils. We expect that the till will be exposed in the building ; <br /> Iexcavation on most of the site. The medium dense weathered till is expected to be encountered about 2 'i <br /> to 3 feet bclow grade on the western portion of the site. We have assumed a minimum depth of burial <br /> ( <br /> ( NELSON-COUYRETTE ek ASSOGATES, ING <br />