1707 SCENIC DR SNO CO PUD 2018-01-02 MF Import

Puget Sound Power.6 Light Co. Special Property Use Pecmit 16-84 Page -10- 35. The Applicant submitted that they had written a letter to the Everett Police Department giving authority to aid in the control of motorbike activity �n the site. 36. The Applicant submitted that much of the zefuge that has accumulated on the subject property and the adjoining property is old gacbage. Further the Applicant submitted that collection of the qarbage being accumulated was beyond their control. However, they agreed to attempt to remove all refuge that has accumulated cn the site. 37. The Applicant submitted that easements of other utility i�ompanies prohibit stcict enforcement of the condition that all tranamission lines shall be no closer than 100 feet to the nearest re3idential property. The Applicant did submit however that they would make attempts to try to stay within the existing easements. Further the Applicant submitted that any clearing related to line installation should be limited to 25 feet and not 20 feet as the City of Everett has recommended. According to the Applicant 25 feet is standard foc the industry. 38. The Applzcant stated that landscaping shall be provided in accordance with Exhibit #8 to this hearing; and, that a chainlink fence with wooden slats will be installed to :educe the visual impact. However, the Applicant desired this to be part of Phase II. According to the Applicant, all development under Phase I will be partially screened by existing lattice steel structures that will be reroved in Phase II and the landscaping would not be beneficial during this stage. 39. A witness (Hylback) testified to have concern on the lacation of the future 230 kV line and how far east wi.thin the subject praperty it will extend. Further, t!ie witnPss recommendec that new fencing be provided during the ficst two ph�ses and not at the end of the third phase. 40. A witness (Mathew) submitted that the remodeling which wi.il occur during the first two phases will improve the site visually. However the expansion as proposed in Phase III may offset the benefits from the remodeling. Therefore the witness submitted that any remodeling as proposed in Phase III should require a staff review and a hearing prior to any permits being yranted.