My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1707 SCENIC DR SNO CO PUD 2018-01-02 MF Import
>
Address Records
>
SCENIC DR
>
1707
>
SNO CO PUD
>
1707 SCENIC DR SNO CO PUD 2018-01-02 MF Import
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/17/2020 2:57:05 PM
Creation date
3/9/2017 1:58:34 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Address Document
Street Name
SCENIC DR
Street Number
1707
Tenant Name
SNO CO PUD
Imported From Microfiche
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
273
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Puget Power SPU 16-84 <br />Anendment <br />Page -2- <br />II <br />The Applicant has �equested amendments to Findings of Fact �19, <br />i23(14), and t37. These Findings of Facts remain as stated in <br />the original document of March 26, 1485. <br />Finding t19 remains as stated. There were residents within the <br />area, including residents on 75th Street, who indicated that <br />landscaping and a greenbelt should be maintained between <br />adjoining properties and the transmission lines. To adopt the <br />requested amended Finding of the Applic3nt, that the finding be <br />modified to read that residents on 75L•h Street indicated that <br />landscaping or a greenbelt should be maintained between <br />adjoining properties and the transmisrion line:, would be an <br />incomplete declaration of the testimony submitte.i at the public <br />hearinq. <br />Finding #23(14) is a direct quote from the Everett Planning <br />Department's recommendations of the reauest. This was the <br />evidence that was submitted at the hearing and this declaration <br />will not be chanqed. <br />Finding i37 of the Match 26, 1985, Findings was: <br />The Applicant submitted that easements <br />of other utility companies ptohibit <br />strict enforcement of the condition that <br />all transmission lines shall be no <br />closer than 100 feet to the nearesk <br />residential property. The Applicant did <br />submit, howevec, that they would make <br />attempts to try to stay within the <br />existing easements. Further the <br />Applicant submitted that any clearing <br />related to line installation should be <br />Limited to 25 feet and not 20 feet as <br />the City of Everett has recommended. <br />According to the Applicant 25 feet is <br />standard Eor the industry. <br />In its request for reconsideration the Applicant submitted that <br />it is their opinion of Findi�g A37 that: <br />it is assumed that the 100' setback referred to <br />the north pcoperty line; <br />2. the 50' immediately adjacent to the north property <br />line was encumbered by an easement in favor of the <br />Snohnmish County P.U.D. for the construction of an <br />over-head line; and <br />3. Puget's minimum clearance requirement for the <br />construction 115 kV lines is 50 feet per Line or <br />150 feet away from the re-built substation. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.