9410 SHARON DR 2016-01-01 MF Import

Nukilteo Schooi Districe SPU 1-?1 Page 3- _ �l .,. Coopatibility of proposed stzuctures and improvements with surro!:nding properties, including [he size, height, locati.on, 5ett�ack, and arrangement of all propoced 6uildings and facilities, aspecially 3s they relate to light: and shadow impacts on more sensitive land uses and less intensive zones. . . The number, size, and location of signs, especially as they relate [o mare sensitive land uses. G. ;he landscaping, buffering, and screening of buildings, parking, Loading, and storage areas, especially as they relate to more sensitive land uses. H. The generation of nuisance irritants such as noise, smoke, dust, odor, glare, visual blight, or other undesirable impacts. I. Consistency uith the goals and policies of the Everett General Plan for the area and thr_ land use designation in Which the property is located. J. Compliance with the provisions of this ordinance and other City, State, and Fea.=ra1 regulations. 9. The Mukilteo School District is experiencing rapid growth as a result of growth in the Snohomish County ar.ea. As a result of this rapid growth, [he school district must provide facilities for expanded schaol population and also provide alternative educational opportunities. There is a necd for alternative educational opportunities in the City of Everett. 10. The Applicant's representative indicated that '.he sub�ect property is not a desirable site Eor the permanen[ alternati.ve high school facility and that the site of the subject property will be interim use. The Applicant indicated tliat failure of school levy bonds has temporarily delayed the location and construction of the permanent site. In the near future, the voters of the Muki:Lteo School District will be presented with ao opportunity to vote on the bond �ich will finance the project. 11, The access to [he site will be off tiolly Drive and onto 98th StrePt. The direct access to the site will include access through the Challenger elementary School area to the site. Flolly Drive is not improved to City standards and the City indicated that such improvements are needed for the development. 12. The City indicated tha[ curbs, gutters, and sidevalks are needed on ilolly Drive but only streec improvements are needed on 98th Street. There could be no construction in the area of [he existing wetlands. 13. Utilities are available to serve the site. ?S. The proposed project will generate approximately 156 vehicular trips per aay on Holly Drive. Holly Drive is of adequate size to handle the increased traffic. llolly Drive is an arterial street.