Laserfiche WebLink
Ia <br /> iz <br /> • Review basic project requirements and constraints, including project objectives, critical design <br /> issues, operation requirements of water system while Reservoir No. 3 is drained, construction <br /> access, project schedule, and other issues. <br /> • Visit Reservoirs No. 3 and No. 5 sites. Access into Reservoir No. 3 is limited to the area <br /> immediately adjacent to the cover access hatch and therefore visual observation is limited. <br /> Observe interior structural features inside (drained) Reservoir No. 5 that are similar to Reservoir <br /> No. 3. <br /> • Discuss and document inlet/outlet pipe configuration for Reservoir No. 3. <br /> For budgeting purposes, it has been assumed that two MWH staff will attend the meeting and site <br /> visit, which will last approximately 8 hours. <br /> 1.3 Design Meetings. Conduct up to two meetings with City staff to review reservoir operations, <br /> construction issues, liner connection to column footings, liner rehabilitation options located at inlet <br /> pipe, liner material selection, design/specification decisions, project schedule and other design <br /> issues. For budgeting purposes it has been assumed that two MWH staff will attend each meeting <br /> (up to three hours each) at City's office. A meeting summary documenting action items and key <br /> decisions will be prepared and distributed within three business days after each meeting. <br /> 1.4 Design Criteria Summary. Prepare a Design Criteria Summary Technical Memorandum.(TM) <br /> documenting key design decisions. The TM will consist of one page of text and present the design <br /> criteria and issue decisions in table format. The following key design issues will be presented in the <br /> TM: <br /> • Liner material alternatives: polypropylene or Hypalon®. <br /> • Appropriateness of installing the new geomembrane liner directly over the existing liner located <br /> on the reservoir concrete side slope. <br /> • Options for connecting the geomembrane liner to the base of the concrete column footings. The <br /> options include 1) locating the batten bar anchor system on the concrete reservoir floor around <br /> the footing perimeter; and 2) locate the batten bar anchor system to the vertical face of the <br /> footings above the concrete reservoir floor. <br /> • Up to three design concepts for improving the existing liner design located beneath the inlet pipe <br /> to prevent future liner damage caused by hydraulic energy from inlet reservoir flows. Design <br /> concepts will be developed during the Kick-off meeting. <br /> • Construction access and staging requirements and constraints for the reservoir site and interior of <br /> the reservoir structure. <br /> • Construction schedule and sequencing constraints necessary to allow the City's continuous <br /> operation of flow through the Reservoir No. 3 bypass line and evaluate the impacts to the Re- <br /> Lining construction work. <br /> • Evaluate using Liquid Boot (or similar product) as a liner for the concrete floor and column <br /> footing surfaces in-lieu of using a geomembrane liner. Evaluation will include the following: 1) <br /> Contact up to three separate municipal owners whom have used this product to line potable water <br /> reservoirs in similar situations; 2) review adequacy of waterproofing the concrete panel joints <br /> and 3) environmental installation requirements, installation duration and compatibility with other <br /> materials such as geomembrane liners. <br /> Submit five copies of the Design Criteria Summary TM to the City fifteen working days after NTP. <br /> The City will provide a single set of consolidated review comments to MWH within four working <br /> days of receipt. MWH will incorporate City comments, and issue the Final TM. Decisions <br /> 00 <br /> City of Everett Exhibit A—Scope of Work <br /> Engineering Services for Reservoir No.3 Re-Lining Project Page 2 <br />