3210 36TH PL NE 2018-01-02 MF Import

;: f��. it, 25. The proposal is consistent with the Goals and Policies of the Everett General ,�, Comprehensive Plan and the designation of 5.1 Heavy Industrial. It is also r� cons�stent with the zoning designation of M-2, Heavy Manufacturing. (�nding 7J 26. The proposal would comply with all city, state, and federal regulations. (�nding 8) 27. The site is not served by public transportation. SHORELINE PERMIT CONCLUSIOMS 28. The proposal complies with the policies and procedures of the Shoreline Act of the State of Washington, as well as the City's Shoreline Master Program. The proposal is permitted in the Urban-Mixed Use Industrial shoreline designation. Flood hazards have been considered and adequate measures �re proposed to protect the site. Public access h�as been provided for in previous developments. Stormwater and process water systems wouid be designed to ensure contaminants do not enter surface or ground water. The Best P_4anageinent Practices during and after construction would ensure proteciion of the shoraline environment. (findings 23, 27-2S) ?_9. As noted in the previous set of Conclusions, the proposal is consistent with and complies with SEPA. DECISION Based upon the preceding Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, the ap�eal of the August 29, 2005, Mitigated Determination of Non-Significance is denied, and the Mitigated Determination of Non-Significance remains as issued. Based on the preceding Findings of Fact and Conclusions and testimony and evidence submitted at the public hearing, the request for approval of a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit and Special Property Use Permit for the construction of a ready-mix concrete batch plant with associated storage and retail facilities on property at 3640 — 34th Avenue NE, Everett, Wasliington ar� granted subject to tlie following conditions: 1. The proposed project must meet the policies and regulations of the City of Everett SMP and must be gererally consistent with the application materials presented to the City. Any modifications to this proposal ara subject to review by the Planning Director, who may approve the modification(�) as being insignificant or present the modification(s) to the Hearing Examiner wf�o may approve the proposed modification(s) or reopen the hearing to take ad i�r�onal public testimony. 18