Laserfiche WebLink
c) The modification will result in less visual impact created by off-street <br />parking areas when viewed from public streets or private properties which abut <br />the property than would be likely without the modification of development <br />standards. <br />Finding: The off-street parking was set up to share driveways with the parking <br />pads out side of the garage are less than the minimum of 20 X 20 feet. The <br />parking pads at 20 feet will either extend into the common driving lane or <br />landscaping area. The only way this plan will function is if the total area is paved. <br />The cul-de-sac is proposed with no v -�rtical curb this will make it appears as one <br />curb cut and will allow parking on the sidewalk and will not protect street trees <br />and landscape areas and yards. <br />Conclusion: The unit design is basic with not much variation the parking with <br />required paving will dominant the streetscape. <br />d) The dwelling unit orientation and design promotes greater privacy for <br />existing residential areas abutting the subject property, and between individual <br />dwellings within the cluster development than would be likely to occur without the <br />modification of development standards. Consideration will be given to orientation <br />and design of dwelling units, screening, and landscaping. <br />Finding: The ,ite plan design is based on a 40- foot right-of-way. The additional <br />10-feet of right -or -way will effact all of the ur.'ts and there function. The lots and <br />units 1, 5, 10, and 11 do not have minimum rear yard area. These units rear <br />yard area is in the side yard. The applicant has not provided a side elevation <br />showing that this can function as a useable open space. The rear yard setback <br />on these lots is 5 feet, a 10 foot setback could allow this side area to be used as <br />functioning open space if it was continuous and the side yard has a diminution or <br />side setback of 15 feet or greater. The units on Lots 9. 10, and 11 are 5 feet <br />from the side property line (south property line of the proposed project) of the <br />previously approved short plat (lots 1 and 2). ThPre is a 3 foot and 6 foot wood <br />fence on these property lines both units are single family two story dwellings. <br />The project is proposing a 5-foot shadow board fence adjacent to the existing <br />fences <br />Conclusion: The design of the units does not promotes better privacy for <br />existing residential areas on the abutting property or between the dwelling units. <br />e) The modification will result in the protection or enhancement of <br />environmentally sensitive areas or historic structures not likely to occur without <br />the modification of development standards. If these features do not exist, this <br />section will not apply. <br />Finding: The streams and wetlands are being set aside as an Environmentally <br />Sensitive Area Tract. <br />Conclusion: The project is consistent with EMC 19.37 of the Toning Code. <br />NOW, THEREFORE, the City of Everett hereby RECOMMENDS that Cluster <br />Subdivision #03-wl)l be Denied for the following reasons: <br />2930 Wetmore, Suite #8A, E: erett, WA 98201-4044 S'i (425) 257-8731, Fax (425) 257-8742 /Q l/ Z_ <br />