Laserfiche WebLink
.. c- <br />� January 6, 1975 <br />The regular monthly meeting of the City of �verett Board of <br />Adjustment was hel.d at 7:30 p.m., January 6, 1975, in the <br />City Hall Council ChamUers, City Hall, �verett, Washington. <br />Mr. Cronin presided. Mr. Berg and Mr. Baird were present. <br />Mr. Graff was absent. <br />Since the first item on the agenda was a continuation from <br />the previous meeting, Mr. Shocl:ey read that portion of ihe <br />December 2, 1974 minutes pertaining to the Brandvold request. <br />T� hearing was held on the aPP�Yimately 4900rVistalPlacenforld <br />for property located at app <br />a variance from Section 15.04.080 Everett City Code (7.oninR) <br />paragraph C. A'Iinimum lot size and widaYcels.pe0nesparcel of <br />divide a tract of land into four (4) p <br />�ahich is to have ingress and egress over a thirty-iive foot <br />easement across the adjacent parcel and which will therefore <br />not have irontaqe on a public street. <br />Legal Description: The South 163.8 feet of the N; of the <br />S; of the NWa of the SL; of Section 36, <br />Twp. 20 N Rge. 4 E.�4•M• �xcept the <br />East 210 feet of the North 150 ft. throf. <br />Zoning: R-1 Single Family Residential. <br />Mr. Shockey read the application and a letter from D7r. �9.Ii. <br />Ross and Mr. L.C. Buell protesting of the granting of this <br />variance. Mr. Brandvold tl�en spoke and indicated thai� it <br />o;as his intention to dedicate 13.8 feet of land between Elm <br />Street and Vista P1ace to provide additional right oi waY <br />widtli along 49th Street and to provide anconnectionabetaeen <br />his property to allo�a continuous utility <br />ti;ood Place and 99th Street to Elm Street. <br />Mr. Shockey noted that the jurisciiction of the Board, in regard <br />to i:hi.s proposed subdivision, is l.imited to thc question <br />of the easement tor accn�s to the most caesTorertl�aill�leer <br />questions regarding the platting oi this p P y <br />di.scussed under short plat requirements as outlined by State <br />law. <br />There were no further questions or comment�s andmconsiderinqce. <br />After visually viewi.ng the subject prop-'�y and seconded <br />all facts presented, it was moved by bir. rant this requesi: for <br />by Mr. Baird and unani.mousl,� carried to g <br />tlie following reasons: <br />