My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
708 32ND ST 2016-01-01 MF Import
>
Address Records
>
32ND ST
>
708
>
708 32ND ST 2016-01-01 MF Import
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/21/2017 4:02:54 PM
Creation date
4/1/2017 3:00:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Address Document
Street Name
32ND ST
Street Number
708
Imported From Microfiche
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
70
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Fair - Component or system falls into one or more of the following categories: a) <br />Evidence of previous repairs not in compliance with commonly accepted stan- <br />dards, b) Workmanship not in compliance with r.ommonly accepted standards, <br />c) Component or system is obsolete, d) Componer:i or system approaching end <br />of expected performance. Repair or repla�:ement is required to prevent further <br />deterioration or to prolong exprcted life. <br />Poor - <br />Component or system has either failed, or cannot be relied upon W condnue <br />performing its original function as a result of havi�g exceeded its expected <br />performance, excessive defened maincenance, or state of disrepair. Present <br />condidon could contribute or cause the deterioration of other adjoining <br />elements or systems. Repair or replacement is required. <br />All radngs aze determined by comparison to other buildings af similaz age and construction type. <br />Furth.er, some details of workmanship and materials will be examined more closely in higher <br />qual' cy homes where such details of workmanship and materials typically become more relevant. <br />Ti.is report is based on an examination of the structure. This report is an opinion about the <br />condition of this portion of the building. It is based on evidence available during a diligent <br />inspection of al] reasonably accessible areas. No surface materials were removed, no destructive <br />testing undertaken, nor fumishings moved. This report is not an exhaustive technical evaluation. <br />Such an evaluation wnuld cost many times more. <br />As Professional Engineers, it is our responsibility to evaluate available evidence relevant to the <br />purpose of this inspection. We are not, however, responsible for conditions that could not be <br />seen or were not within the scope of our service at the time of the inspecGon. <br />DESCRIPTIOIV <br />This house is a one story residence with wood on the exterior walls and an asphalt/fiberglass <br />shingle roof surfacing. There is a basement under the back right corner of this buildi�g. There <br />is a crawl space under the rest of this building which was accessible for inspection. For <br />purposes of this report, all directions (left, right, rear, etc.) aze taken from the viewpoiht of an <br />observer standing in front of the building and facing it. <br />STRUCTURE <br />The basic construction of this building consists of � <br />foundation walls, with a column-girder system for <br />members. This is a standard method of construction <br />corner consists of a concrete slab foundation type, as <br />Mr. John Oschiter <br />�.1 <br />concrete block wall on top of concrete <br />the support of the firs[ floor level joist <br />. The basement portion at the back right <br />well. <br />Page 2 I <br />� <br />� <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.