11325 19TH AVE SE 2018-01-01 MF Import

�' Abbott Homes SMA 13-90 Page -4- 16. The zoaing etandards of the City of Everett for R-3 zonee allow up to 25 dwelling unite per acre. The propoaed 48 unit apartment complez to be developed on two acrea ia in conformance wi.th theee atandarde. 17. Construction activity will occur on-eite and result in increased noise. The City submitted that the Applicant muet satiefy all noiae regulatione during and after canetruction. Theae regulations include that conetruction activity be limited to houra between 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. 18. Traffic ia a eignificant iaeue on the Silver I,ake Road (the Everett-Bothell Highwaq), Ae part of the procese of mitigating increased traffic, the Applicant hae agreed to a mitigation fee of f23,424.00. The City submitted with this amount no further traffic information is required. 19. Schoole will be impacted by [he propoaed development. Prior to the isauance of the Occupancy Peimita �he Applicant muat malce paymente of a mitigation fee in the amount of f8,294.40 to the Everett School District. The School District determi�d thie ia the Applicaat's ehare of the impacta to be generated from the development of the eite. 20. Prior to review of the peimit, the Applicant, a neighborhood group, and I the Citq of Everett particlpated in aII BRreemgp,�for the development of the site...and the withdrarial of an appeal of a SEPA th�reehold dec3aion: 'I As part of the conaideration for the appellant's withdrawal of I` oppoaition to the Determination of Non-Significance (DNS), the Applicant agreed to participate in the mitigation measures, including street improvmenta, dedication of propertq for recreational purpoaea, and achool improvemeate. In addition, the deeign of a atructure wae changed to leaeen any aesthetic impacte to the site. The mitigation agree�ent vae submitted ae ezhibit B10 at the ublic hearin . ., P 8 21. The Planning Department of the City of Everett reviewed the propoaed parking. The Applicant indicated that the facility rri.11 have 96 off-street parking apacea. According to the City, thie xill reeult in tsro off-atreet parking epaces which, according to the City, exceeds the atandarde ae required for R-3 zoned property. The parking ia coneistent , fri.th the developmenta in the area. ; 22. The City testified that the approval of the permit should be granted I' subject to the conditione which are set forth in the etaff report. The hco�itione have incorporated the elemente cf the agreement betaeen the � City, the Applicant, and the neighborhood group. The Applicant agreed i : with the City's reco�endation of approval. F 23. No testimon wae submitted at the g pp l Y public hearin in o oeition to the j City's reco�endation. All public teatimony aupported the City's � recommendations. C �