2801 10TH ST 2018-01-02 MF Import

(k) Compliance with other provisions of this Ordinance and other City, State, and Federal regulations (EMC 19.38.090) 7. Because the facility will provide a juvenile justice complex, it is a need of Snohomish County and the City of Everett. It will provide a facility that can adequately pracess juvenile criminal and civii disputes. The need was furt!�er demonstrated by the voters of Snohornish County who passed Proposition 6 on February 4, 1994. (findings of fact�i5 and#6) 8. The streets surrounding the subject property can carry the traffic of the proposec+ use. With improvements on 10th Street from the southwest property line to rhe intersection of 10th and Poplar, the street is able to carry the traffic generated by the proposed site. Pine Street is adequate ir its current state to carry the proposal's traffic. (finding of fact#15) 9. Utilities and public services are required and are available to the site. (finding of fact#11) 10. The traffic to be generated by the proposed project will not significantly increase. The facility currently has traffic ingressing and egressing the site. As noted, 10th Street and Rine Street are adequate to handle any increasa of traffic. (finding of fact#16) 11. Pedestrian circulation and public safety have been adequately addressed. With improvemants on 10th Street, including sidewalks and with internal pedestrian circulation considered in the design of the parking lot, this criterion is satisfied. (finding of fact#21 j 12. Adequate parking is proposed for this facility. Althuugh there are no parking standards, the proposed �J3 parking stalls will satisfy the parking needs for the proposed facility. (finding of fact#19) 13. The proposed structure of 110,000 syuare feet to be located on the 5.9 acre site will be compatible with surrounding properties. With landscaping as proposed, including ihe modification from the landscaping standards, as reGuested by the Aoplicant, along with the pla�ement of the building in a depressior: on the site, impact to adjoining properties will be limited. (findings of fact#23 & #27) 14. The number of signs proposed by the Applicant is reasonable. In order to satisfy the sign area standards. The identification sign area must to be reduced. (Bnding of fact#26) 11