My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Resolution 4406
>
Resolutions
>
Resolution 4406
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/4/2017 9:39:58 AM
Creation date
4/4/2017 9:39:54 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Resolutions
Resolution Number
4406
Date
3/19/1997
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
comprehensive plan amendment to demonstrate that any amendment to Everett's plan is both <br /> internally consistent with other sections and elements of the comprehensive plan, and consistent <br /> with the plans of adjacent jurisdictions (i.e., Snohomish County) (Section 1.H of Ordinance <br /> #2161-96). <br /> 15. The following policy from Everett's comprehensive plan is relevant to the subject <br /> application: <br /> 1.3.4 Identify on the Land Use Map appropriate areas in which to apply the following <br /> industrial land use designations: <br /> (d) Office and Industrial Park. Areas where a high quality, campus style of office and <br /> industrial park development can occur on large parcels of land. <br /> (Page LU-22 of Exhibit A of Ordinance #2021-94) <br /> 16. In response to the above policy, City staff commented: <br /> The applicant has argued that the desired style of development cannot economically occur <br /> on the subject property. The City acknowledges that any type of urban development of <br /> sloping properties, whether industrial or residential, is more costly than on flat land. The <br /> applicant has not demonstrated that industrial development of the site is impossible, only <br /> more costly. A nearby example of industrial development which has occurred on sloping <br /> property is the Dennis Petroleum property which has similar topography to the subject <br /> site, and required extensive grading and construction of large retaining wall structures. <br /> This site was undoubtedly more costly to develop than a flat site, but it was successfully <br /> developed. (Staff report for Planning Commission public hearing of December 3, 1996). <br /> 17. The following policy from Everett's comprehensive plan is relevant to the subject <br /> application: <br /> 1.3.9 Protect industrial lands from encroachment by other land uses which would reduce the <br /> economic viability of industrial lands. <br /> (Page LU-23 of Exhibit A of Ordinance #2021-94) <br /> 18. In response to the above policy, City staff commented: <br /> The Boeing Company has argued that the proposed land use change would constitute <br /> encroachment by incompatible land uses which would reduce the economic viability of <br /> both Paine Field airport and other existing industrial land uses. (Staff report for Planning <br /> Commission public hearing of December 3, 1996). <br /> 19. The following policy from Everett's comprehensive plan is relevant to the subject <br /> application: <br /> 1.11.3 Southwest Everett: Southwest Everett contains one of the largest inventories of <br /> undeveloped industrial land served by utility and transportation infrastructure in <br /> the Puget Sound. This industrial area is home to industries that employed over <br /> 24,000 workers in 1990. In addition to large employment increases anticipated <br /> from recent expansion at the Boeing plant, there are over 700 acres of vacant or <br /> redevelopable industrially zoned land in this area. With the exception of <br /> approximately 100 acres located between Japanese Gulch and the Mukilteo city <br /> limits, it is all readily accessible and served by water and sewer utilities. The <br /> 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.