9624 18TH AVE W 2016-01-01 MF Import

20. The proposal is consistent with all City, State, and Federal regulations. (exhibit 1, Palacios testimony) 21. Public transit is not provided on-site. However, the Applicant indicated that she will encouraye carpools to help reduce traffic. (Meacham testimony) 22. An adjoining property owner submitted that he was in the process of developing his property with single-family residences. He indicated the proposal was compatible, and the Applicant �ill have access to utilities. (Gribble testimony) 23. Correspondence was received from a resident (Anton Jackson) who has lived in the neighborhood for approximately 40 years. He was concerned about the protection of the residential nature of the neighborhood and submitted that increased traffic would occur. He contended that the subject property is currently untidy and used for purposes other than a daycare. Included in the uses, according to the witness, is a junk yard that is guarded by three junk yard dogs. (exhibit 6) Jurisdiction: The Hearinn Examiner of the City of Everett has jurisdictional authority to hola a hearing and to issue the decision. That authority is set forth in EMC 2.23.120. Based on the above Findings of Fact, the Hearing Examiner enters the following Conclusions: CONCLUSIONS The Applicant requested approval of a permit for the conversion of an existing family home daycare on property located at 9624-18th Avenue West, Everett, Washington. Upon issuance of the permit it is the intent of the Applir,ank to convert the existing faciiity to a Montessori preschool daycare that tvould accommodate up to 40 children. (�nding 1) 2. In order for a Special Property Use Permit to be granted within the City of Everett, the criteria of EMC 19.41.150.0 must satisfied. These criteria are listed in findinp of fact #5. All of the criteria of EMC 19.41.150.0 have been satisfied. The manner in which each criterion is satisfied is set forth in findings 6-21. ��