Laserfiche WebLink
Karen Williams - Submitted that public safety must come first. She questioned <br /> the guarantee that the events at the facility would not be "dangerous events". <br /> Lenorah Williams - Submitted that she purchased her house in Lowell because <br /> of the small non-violent neighborhood. She was concerned that the proposed <br /> facility could bring violence to the area. <br /> Elly Smith - Submitted that she drops her daughter weekday mornings at a bus <br /> stop near the proposed facility. She questioned whether her daughter would be <br /> safe because of the close proximity of the proposed facility to the bus stop. <br /> Mary Drayton - Submitted that she is opposed to Second Chance. If the Second <br /> Chance facility is approved, she will have reservations about purchasing a home <br /> in the Lowell neighborhood. <br /> Weston Williams - No personal comments. <br /> Mr. & Mrs. Dean Larson - No personal comments. <br /> Loren Watson - No personal comments. <br /> Mary Zuovich - No personal comments. <br /> Gary Williams - No personal comments. <br /> Bob Dahlgren - No personal comments. <br /> AnnMarie Allen - No personal comments. <br /> Shirley Watson - No personal comments. <br /> Della Bruett - No personal comments. <br /> 51. In addition to the above referred to exhibits, Mr. Slatten submitted exhibit #69, a <br /> 15 page summary of his position on the requested Special Property Use Permit. <br /> In the exhibit, Mr. Slatten documents his arguments of opposition and submits <br /> that the proposal does not satisfy the criteria of EMC 19.41.150.0 & D. In <br /> particular, he contended that there was not a need for the proposed facility <br /> because of its excessive size and because other detention facilities in the City of <br /> Everett provide juvenile justice services to the community and to the State. <br /> 23 <br />