1600 121ST ST SE 2016-01-01 MF Import

frontage improvemer,ts for the proposal were within 200 feet of the ordinary high water mark of Silver Lake, and were therefore subject to the Shoreline Mana��ement Ad. A Local Improvement Distnct (LID) was proposed to construct frontage improvements on Silver Lake Road, as well as intersection improvements at SR 527 and 121st St. SW. One of the options available to the applicant was to let the LID construct the required street frontage improvements. If the LID proceeded, the City was to be the proponent for obtaining a shoreline substantial development permit to construct the frontage improvements. Therefore, the City did not require the applicant to submit an application for a shoreline permit. The City has since detertnined that it would be more appropriate to construct the 121st St. SWISR 527 intersection improvements with improvements to SR 527 after a design study and environmental analysis of the overall area. Therefore, the LID for 121st Sl. SW is not proceeding at this time, and lhe developer is required to obtain a shoreline pertnit and construct frontage improvements to the site. In April, 1992, representatives of the Washington State Department of Ecology conducled field investigations and defined the ordinery h'gh water mark of Silver Lake. The delineaGon was further to the south than shown on the maps historically used by the City to define the ordinary high water mark. Based on this new inf�rtnation, the 200 foot shoreline jurisdiction extends well onto the project site, and a shoreline pertnit is required for the entire apartmenUtownhouse complex. In May 1992 to July 1992, the applicant submitted a shoreline permit applicaUon for Phase I and Phase II and a SEPA application for Phase II. The current proposal is for the construction of 110 units on Phase I and 12 units on Phase II. Phase I of the proposal must be in confortnance with the requirements of the R-3(A) zone in effect in 1989. Phase II must be in confortnance with the requirements of the current R-3 zone. See Exhibit 8, Casper Creek Vesting Decision, tor detailed infortnati�n regarding the chronology of submittal of application matenals for the proposal, and the vesting of Phase I and Phase II under the Zoning Code. 7he City completed a SEPA environmental review for the proposal and issued a Ravised Mitigated Detertnination of Non•significence (MDNS) on August 28, 1992. The 10-day appeal period for the MDNS ended on September 8, 1992. No appeals were received. The MDNS is inGuded as Exhibft 5. ConGusions: The site is located within the 200 foot shoreline jurisdiction of Silver Lake. The project must be d�aveloped in confortnance with all Zoning Code regulations per the Casper Creek Vesting Decision (Exhibit 8). 9ased upon compliance with the conditions listed in the MDNS, the proposal will not have a probable significant adverse impact on the enviranment.